Suppr超能文献

常压氧与高压氧缓解一氧化碳所致头痛疼痛的比较。

Comparison of normobaric vs. hyperbaric oxygen in the relief of carbon monoxide headache pain.

作者信息

Hampson Neil B, Ocak Tarik

机构信息

Center for Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, U.S.

Emergency Department, Akgun TEM Private Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Undersea Hyperb Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;44(4):331-336. doi: 10.22462/7.8.2017.5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Headache is the most common symptom in carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. While the mechanism of CO-induced headache is not well defined, it is felt that cerebral vasodilation plays a role. Clinical experience has demonstrated oxygen breathing is effective in resolving CO headache. However, the effectiveness of normobaric oxygen has never been compared to hyperbaric oxygen in this regard.

METHODS

A 2016 paper by Ocak, et al. reported the response of CO headache pain severity to four hours of normobaric oxygen breathing in 82 patients using a 0-10 analog scale. The demographics, carboxyhemoglobin levels and response to therapy from that report were compared to data obtained by Hampson, et al. in an earlier study, but never published, using the same pain assessment method in 73 patients with CO headache and treated with hyperbaric oxygen.

RESULTS

Comparing the normobaric and hyperbaric groups, neither average age nor presenting carboxyhemoglobin levels were significantly different. Baseline pain intensity scores were 6.5 ± 3.1 vs. 6.2 ± 2.6 (p=0.444) and post-treatment scores 1.5 ± 2.6 vs. 1.0 ± 1.5 (p=0.184) respectively on a 0-10 scale.

CONCLUSIONS

In these two well-matched populations of patients with CO-induced headache pain, degree of resolution was not significantly different between normobaric and hyperbaric oxygen treatment.

摘要

背景

头痛是一氧化碳(CO)中毒最常见的症状。虽然CO诱发头痛的机制尚未完全明确,但认为脑血管扩张起了一定作用。临床经验表明,吸氧对缓解CO所致头痛有效。然而,在这方面常压氧的有效性从未与高压氧进行过比较。

方法

奥恰克等人2016年的一篇论文报告了82例患者在使用0至10分模拟量表的情况下,常压吸氧4小时后CO头痛疼痛严重程度的变化。将该报告中的人口统计学数据、碳氧血红蛋白水平及治疗反应与汉普森等人在一项早期研究(但从未发表)中获得的数据进行比较,后者对73例CO头痛患者采用相同的疼痛评估方法并进行高压氧治疗。

结果

比较常压氧组和高压氧组,平均年龄和初始碳氧血红蛋白水平均无显著差异。在0至10分的量表上,基线疼痛强度评分分别为6.5±3.1和6.2±2.6(p = 0.444),治疗后评分分别为1.5±2.6和1.0±1.5(p = 0.184)。

结论

在这两组匹配良好的CO诱发头痛患者中,常压氧治疗和高压氧治疗的缓解程度无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验