Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症患者的条件推理

Conditional Reasoning in Schizophrenic Patients.

作者信息

Kornreich Charles, Delle-Vigne Dyna, Brevers Damien, Tecco Juan, Campanella Salvatore, Noël Xavier, Verbanck Paul, Ermer Elsa

机构信息

1 Laboratoire de Psychologie Médicale, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

2 Centre Hospitalier Le Chêne aux Haies, Mons, Belgium.

出版信息

Evol Psychol. 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):1474704917721713. doi: 10.1177/1474704917721713.

Abstract

Conditional reasoning (if p then q) is used very frequently in everyday situations. Conditional reasoning is impaired in brain-lesion patients, psychopathy, alcoholism, and polydrug dependence. Many neurocognitive deficits have also been described in schizophrenia. We assessed conditional reasoning in 25 patients with schizophrenia, 25 depressive patients, and 25 controls, using the Wason selection task in three different domains: social contracts, precautionary rules, and descriptive rules. Control measures included depression, anxiety, and severity of schizophrenia measures as a Verbal Intelligence Scale. Patients with schizophrenia were significantly impaired on all conditional reasoning tasks compared to depressives and controls. However, the social contract and precautions tasks yielded better results than the descriptive tasks. Differences between groups disappeared for social contract but remained for precautions and descriptive tasks when verbal intelligence was used as a covariate. These results suggest that domain-specific reasoning mechanisms, proposed by evolutionary psychologists, are relatively resilient in the face of brain network disruptions that impair more general reasoning abilities. Nevertheless, patients with schizophrenia could encounter difficulties understanding precaution rules and social contracts in real-life situations resulting in unwise risk-taking and misunderstandings in the social world.

摘要

条件推理(如果p那么q)在日常生活中使用非常频繁。脑损伤患者、精神病患者、酗酒者和多种药物依赖者的条件推理能力受损。精神分裂症患者也存在许多神经认知缺陷。我们使用沃森选择任务,在社会契约、预防规则和描述性规则这三个不同领域,对25名精神分裂症患者、25名抑郁症患者和25名对照者进行了条件推理评估。控制变量包括抑郁、焦虑以及作为言语智力量表的精神分裂症严重程度指标。与抑郁症患者和对照者相比,精神分裂症患者在所有条件推理任务上均显著受损。然而,社会契约和预防任务的结果优于描述性任务。当将言语智力作为协变量时,社会契约任务中组间差异消失,但预防任务和描述性任务的差异依然存在。这些结果表明,进化心理学家提出的特定领域推理机制,在面对损害更一般推理能力的脑网络破坏时,具有相对较强的恢复力。尽管如此,精神分裂症患者在现实生活中理解预防规则和社会契约时可能会遇到困难,从而导致在社会环境中做出不明智的冒险行为和产生误解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e90/10480914/fbd34707cdbc/10.1177_1474704917721713-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验