Zeng Xiaoqing, Song Shicheng, Chen Meirong
School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Institute of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Nanchang, P. R. China.
Research Center of Jiangxi Social Psychological Service System Construction, Nanchang, P. R. China.
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2025 Apr-Jun;24(2):590-605. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2023.2215708. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
Previous studies on social contract reasoning of male substance abusers only examined individuals who are using drugs, and most of them compared social contract and nonsocial contract reasoning, and paid less attention to the characteristics of social contract reasoning of substance abusers during withdrawal. In addition, there is little research on the difference between the standard social contract rules and the switched social contract rules. To further explore this issue, experiment 1 examined the differences between 110 male substance abusers' conditional reasoning for descriptive and social contract rules; Experiment 2 examined the differences between 110 other male substance abusers' conditional reasoning for standard and switched social contracts. Results: (1) for male substance abusers, the performance of social contract conditional reasoning is significantly better than descriptive conditional reasoning; (2) the performance of standard social contract rules is significantly better than that of switched social contract rules.
以往关于男性药物滥用者社会契约推理的研究仅考察了正在使用毒品的个体,且大多数研究比较了社会契约推理和非社会契约推理,较少关注药物滥用者戒断期间社会契约推理的特征。此外,对于标准社会契约规则和转换后的社会契约规则之间的差异研究较少。为进一步探究此问题,实验1考察了110名男性药物滥用者对描述性规则和社会契约规则的条件推理之间的差异;实验2考察了另外110名男性药物滥用者对标准社会契约和转换后社会契约的条件推理之间的差异。结果:(1)对于男性药物滥用者,社会契约条件推理的表现显著优于描述性条件推理;(2)标准社会契约规则的表现显著优于转换后社会契约规则。