Barone M, Iannone A, Shahini E, Ippolito A M, Brancaccio G, Morisco F, Milella M, Messina V, Smedile A, Conti F, Gatti P, Santantonio T, Tundo P, Lauletta G, Napoli N, Masetti C, Termite A P, Francavilla R, Di Leo A, Pesce F, Andriulli A
Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Gastroenterology, AOU Policlinico, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Division of Gastroenterology, "Casa Sollievo Sofferenza" Hospital, IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
J Viral Hepat. 2018 Jan;25(1):56-62. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12765. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
The effectiveness of a 12-week course of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir in treatment-experienced HCV genotype 1b-infected patients with cirrhosis is still under debate. Our primary endpoint was to compare the sustained virological response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir in combination with ribavirin for 12 weeks, and sofosbuvir-ledipasvir alone for 24 weeks. This was a prospective observational study that enrolled 424 (195 naive, 229 experienced; 164 treated for 12 weeks with Ribavirin and 260 with sofosbuvir-ledipasvir alone for 24 weeks) consecutive HCV genotype 1b-infected patients with cirrhosis. The SVR12 rates were 93.9% and 99.2% in patients treated for 12 and 24 weeks, respectively (P = .002). The baseline characteristics of patients treated for 12 weeks were significantly different from those treated for 24 weeks as regards their younger age (P = .002), prevalence of Child-Pugh class A (P = .002), lower MELD scores (P = .001) and smaller number of nonresponders (P = .04). The shorter treatment was significantly associated with a lower SVR12 in univariate and multivariate analyses (P = .007 and P = .008, respectively). The SVR rate was unaffected by age, gender, BMI, Child-Pugh class, MELD score or previous antiviral treatment. Patients receiving ribavirin experienced more episodes of ascites and headache but less recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and were prescribed more diuretics and cardiopulmonary drugs. No patient discontinued treatment. The therapeutic regimen of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir plus ribavirin administered for 12 weeks was less effective than sofosbuvir-ledipasvir alone given for 24 weeks. At odds with European guidelines, the recommended 12-week treatment with sofosbuvir-ledipasvir alone might be suboptimal for this setting of patients.
对于经历过治疗的丙型肝炎病毒1b型感染肝硬化患者,使用索磷布韦-雷迪帕韦进行为期12周的疗程治疗的效果仍存在争议。我们的主要终点是比较索磷布韦-雷迪帕韦联合利巴韦林治疗12周后第12周的持续病毒学应答(SVR12),以及单独使用索磷布韦-雷迪帕韦治疗24周后的SVR12。这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了424例连续的丙型肝炎病毒1b型感染肝硬化患者(195例初治患者,229例经治患者;164例接受利巴韦林治疗12周,260例单独接受索磷布韦-雷迪帕韦治疗24周)。接受12周和24周治疗的患者的SVR12率分别为93.9%和99.2%(P = 0.002)。接受12周治疗的患者与接受24周治疗的患者相比,其基线特征在年龄较轻(P = 0.002)、Child-Pugh A级患病率(P = 0.002)、MELD评分较低(P = 0.001)以及无应答者数量较少(P = 0.04)方面存在显著差异。在单因素和多因素分析中,较短的治疗时间与较低的SVR12显著相关(分别为P = 0.007和P = 0.008)。SVR率不受年龄、性别、BMI、Child-Pugh分级、MELD评分或既往抗病毒治疗的影响。接受利巴韦林治疗的患者腹水和头痛发作更多,但肝细胞癌(HCC)复发较少,并且开具了更多的利尿剂和心肺药物。没有患者停止治疗。索磷布韦-雷迪帕韦联合利巴韦林治疗12周的治疗方案不如单独使用索磷布韦-雷迪帕韦治疗24周有效。与欧洲指南不同,对于这类患者,推荐的单独使用索磷布韦-雷迪帕韦治疗12周可能并非最佳方案。