Brkic Faris, Mujic Majda, Umihanic Sekib, Hrncic Nermin, Goga Amna, Goretic Ermin
Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
ENT clinic Tuzla, University Clinical Center Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Med Arch. 2017 Apr;71(2):119-121. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.119-121.
Tonsillectomy is a frequently used, low-risk surgical procedure. The post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage occurs rarely, but is a life-threatening complication. Some studies show that the surgical technique affects the haemorrhage rate.
To analyse the post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage rate, and to determine whether the effect of the surgical technique on the haemorrhage rate exists.
We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients who underwent a tonsillectomy in three regional ENT departments in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Tuzla, Zenica and Bihac) between January 1 2015 and October 31 2016. Disorders which could affect the post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage rate were excluded. Tonsillectomy techniques used in these three centers were the hot technique (monopolar/bipolar forceps dissection and haemostasis) and the combined technique (cold steel dissection with monopolar/bipolar forceps haemostasis).
1087 patients that underwent a tonsillectomy were analysed in this study. 864 (79.48%) of those were children. 922 (84.82%) patients were operated using the combined technique, 165 (15.17%) underwent a tonsillectomy using the hot technique. Post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage occured in 46 (4.23%) patients. 45 (4.88%) patients had a postoperative haemorrhage after tonsillectomy using the combined technique, whereas haemorrhage occured in 1 patient (0.6%) after using the hot technique. The haemorrhage rate was about eight times lower after tonsillectomy using the hot technique (p=0.012).
We conclude that the surgical technique used for tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy with the lowest post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage rate is the hot technique; these results are statistically significant. This technique should be used whenever possible, in order to lower the risk of post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage.
扁桃体切除术是一种常用的低风险外科手术。扁桃体切除术后出血很少发生,但却是一种危及生命的并发症。一些研究表明手术技术会影响出血率。
分析扁桃体切除术后出血率,并确定手术技术对出血率的影响是否存在。
我们回顾性分析了2015年1月1日至2016年10月31日期间在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的三个地区耳鼻喉科(图兹拉、泽尼察和比哈奇)接受扁桃体切除术的所有患者的数据。排除了可能影响扁桃体切除术后出血率的疾病。这三个中心使用的扁桃体切除技术为热技术(单极/双极钳分离和止血)和联合技术(冷钢分离加单极/双极钳止血)。
本研究分析了1087例接受扁桃体切除术的患者。其中864例(79.48%)为儿童。922例(84.82%)患者采用联合技术进行手术,165例(15.17%)采用热技术进行扁桃体切除术。46例(4.23%)患者发生了扁桃体切除术后出血。采用联合技术进行扁桃体切除术后,45例(4.88%)患者出现术后出血,而采用热技术后有1例(0.6%)患者发生出血。采用热技术进行扁桃体切除术后的出血率低约八倍(p = 0.012)。
我们得出结论,扁桃体切除术和腺样体扁桃体切除术使用的手术技术中,术后出血率最低的是热技术;这些结果具有统计学意义。应尽可能使用该技术,以降低扁桃体切除术后出血的风险。