Singh K J, Mohanty S K, Maudar K K
Clinical Tutor, Department of Surgery, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411 040.
Classified Specialist, 92 Base Hospital, C/o 56 APO, Ranchi 834010.
Med J Armed Forces India. 1999 Oct;55(4):322-324. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30360-X. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
A comparative study of repair of inguinal hernias by Shouldice technique (ST) vis-a-vis Bassinis technique (BT) was conducted on 100 patients who presented with inguinal hernia in the OPD services of our hospital. The patients were worked up and alternatively distributed to undergo repair by ST (n=50) or BT (n=50). Repair by ST required longer operating time (Avg 95 min vs 80 min), but involved lesser hospitalization (4.0 days vs 4.5 days), lesser complication rate (2 vs 4), lesser recurrence rate (0 vs 2) and higher rate of satisfaction. The study confirms the advantages of Shouldice repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia.
对在我院门诊服务中出现腹股沟疝的100例患者进行了一项关于采用肖尔代斯技术(ST)与巴西尼技术(BT)修复腹股沟疝的对比研究。对患者进行检查后,将他们交替分配接受ST修复(n = 50)或BT修复(n = 50)。ST修复所需手术时间更长(平均95分钟对80分钟),但住院时间更短(4.0天对4.5天),并发症发生率更低(2例对4例),复发率更低(0例对2例),满意度更高。该研究证实了肖尔代斯修复术在治疗腹股沟疝方面的优势。