Peixoto Alberto Borges, da Cunha Caldas Taciana Mara Rodrigues, Tahan Luisa Almeida, Petrini Caetano Galvão, Martins Wellington P, Costa Fabricio Da Silva, Araujo Júnior Edward
Mario Palmério University Hospital, University of Uberaba (UNIUBE), Uberaba-MG, Brazil.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto-SP, Brazil.
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017 Jul;60(4):329-335. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.4.329. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
To assess the predictive capacity of cervical length (CL) measurement underwent during the second trimester ultrasound for prediction preterm birth <32, 34, and 37 weeks of gestation in an unselected risk population.
A retrospective cohort study was performed with 751 singleton pregnancies between 20 and 24+6 weeks of gestation. The CL measurement (mm) using the transvaginal route was obtained in a sagittal view and the calipers positioned to measure the linear distance between the triangular area of echodensity at the external os and the internal os. To compare the preterm (<37 weeks) and term births (≥37 weeks), we used unpaired t test. We assessed whether the CL measurement was dependent of gestational age by performing a linear regression and assessing the coefficient of determination (R). We additionally assessed the accuracy of CL measurement to predict preterm birth by assessing the area under receiver operating characteristics curves with its respective confidence intervals (CIs) 95%.
Preterm birth <37 weeks was found in 13.6% (102/751) of pregnant women. Short cervix (≤25 mm) was found in 2.7% (20/751) of pregnancies. Only 30% (6/20) of pregnant women with short cervix have used progesterone to prevent preterm birth. There was a weak correlation between CL measurement and gestational age at delivery (R=0.01, =0.002). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of the ability of CL measurement to predict preterm birth <32, 34, and 37 weeks, showed an area under the curve of 0.693 (95% CI, 0.512 to 0.874), 0.472 (95% CI, 0.353 to 0.591), 0.490 (95% CI, 0.426 to 0.555), respectively.
There was a weak correlation between CL measurement and gestational age at delivery. In an unselected population, CL measurement screening at 20 to 24+6 weeks of gestation does not seem to be a good predictor of preterm birth.
评估孕中期超声检查时测量的宫颈长度(CL)对未选择的有风险人群中孕周<32、34和37周早产的预测能力。
对751例孕20至24⁺⁶周的单胎妊娠进行回顾性队列研究。经阴道途径在矢状面获取CL测量值(mm),并放置卡尺测量外口和内口处回声密度三角形区域之间的直线距离。为比较早产(<37周)和足月产(≥37周),我们使用了非配对t检验。通过进行线性回归并评估决定系数(R),我们评估了CL测量值是否依赖于孕周。我们还通过评估受试者工作特征曲线下面积及其各自的95%置信区间(CIs)来评估CL测量预测早产的准确性。
13.6%(102/751)的孕妇发生了<37周的早产。2.7%(20/751)的妊娠发现宫颈短(≤25 mm)。宫颈短的孕妇中只有30%(6/20)使用了孕激素预防早产。CL测量值与分娩时孕周之间存在弱相关性(R=0.01,P=0.002)。CL测量预测<32、34和37周早产能力的受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,曲线下面积分别为0.693(95%CI,0.512至0.874)、0.472(95%CI,0.353至0.591)、0.490(95%CI,0.426至0.555)。
CL测量值与分娩时孕周之间存在弱相关性。在未选择的人群中,孕20至24⁺⁶周时进行CL测量筛查似乎不是早产的良好预测指标。