Rees D G, Henry C J, Diskett P, Shears P
Lancet. 1987 Jan 10;1(8524):87-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91920-9.
In 738 children aged under 5 from three communities in north-east Brazil, nutritional status was assessed by four means-weight for age, height for age, weight for height, and middle upper arm circumference (MUAC). As judged by weight for age, 43% of children were adequately nourished and only 2% were severely malnourished. Stunting (less than 85% height for age) was seen in 8% and wasting (less than 70% weight for height) in 1%. There was poor agreement between MUAC (a measure of wasting) and weight for height when the conventional cut-off points for MUAC were applied. Although agreement improved with new MUAC cut-off points the probability of correct diagnosis of wasting (sensitivity) remained low. Although height for age and weight for height were the most useful measures of nutritional status, MUAC may be the best available in famine victims and refugees.
在巴西东北部三个社区的738名5岁以下儿童中,通过年龄别体重、年龄别身高、身高别体重和上臂中部周长(MUAC)这四种方式评估营养状况。根据年龄别体重判断,43%的儿童营养充足,只有2%的儿童严重营养不良。8%的儿童发育迟缓(年龄别身高低于85%),1%的儿童消瘦(身高别体重低于70%)。当应用MUAC的传统切点时,MUAC(一种消瘦指标)与身高别体重之间的一致性较差。尽管采用新的MUAC切点后一致性有所改善,但正确诊断消瘦的概率(敏感性)仍然较低。尽管年龄别身高和身高别体重是营养状况最有用的指标,但MUAC可能是饥荒受害者和难民中现有的最佳指标。