Suppr超能文献

经皮肾镜取石术中肾盂压力:多通道的影响。

Renal Pelvic Pressure in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: The Effect of Multiple Tracts.

作者信息

Abourbih Samuel, Alsyouf Muhannad, Yeo Alexander, Martin Jacob, Vassantachart Janna M, Lee Michael, Maldonado Jonathan, Lightfoot Michelle, Li Roger, Olgin Gaudencio, Baldwin D Duane

机构信息

Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health , Loma Linda, California.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2017 Oct;31(10):1079-1083. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0298. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

During percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), elevated renal pelvic pressures (RPPs) may spread infection through pyelovenous backflow whereas decreased pressures can hinder observation and increase bleeding. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of multiple access tracts and different sized endoscopic equipment on RPP in a porcine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RPP was measured in one- vs two-tract access, rigid vs flexible nephroscopy, and suction vs no suction. Twenty trials were performed for each condition. An independent samples Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare parameters, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

With one tract, rigid nephroscopy resulted in higher mean pressures (31.35 mm Hg) than flexible nephroscopy (11.1 mm Hg; p < 0.001). The RPP was higher with rigid nephroscopy in one tract (31.35 mm Hg) than when two tracts were present (9.35 mm Hg; p < 0.001). In contrast, there was no difference in pressure during the use of a flexible nephroscope in one (11.1 mm Hg) vs two tracts (10.7 mm Hg; p = 0.63). Use of suction with the rigid nephroscope resulted in significantly lower pressures with one (-1.3 mm Hg) than with two tracts (1.8 mm Hg; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

In PCNL, RPP is significantly affected by an additional tract during rigid nephroscopy and suctioning but not when using a flexible nephroscope. Understanding the effects of multiple tracts and equipment type on RPP may improve the safety of PCNL.

摘要

引言

在经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)期间,肾盂压力(RPP)升高可能通过肾盂静脉逆流传播感染,而压力降低会妨碍观察并增加出血。本研究的目的是在猪模型中评估多通道入路和不同尺寸的内镜设备对RPP的影响。

材料与方法

测量单通道与双通道入路、硬性与软性肾镜检查以及有吸引与无吸引情况下的RPP。每种情况进行20次试验。使用独立样本曼-惠特尼U检验比较参数,p < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

单通道时,硬性肾镜检查导致的平均压力(31.35毫米汞柱)高于软性肾镜检查(11.1毫米汞柱;p < 0.001)。单通道硬性肾镜检查时的RPP(31.35毫米汞柱)高于双通道时(9.35毫米汞柱;p < 0.001)。相比之下,单通道(11.1毫米汞柱)与双通道(10.7毫米汞柱;p = 0.63)使用软性肾镜时压力无差异。硬性肾镜使用吸引时,单通道(-1.3毫米汞柱)的压力显著低于双通道(1.8毫米汞柱;p = 0.004)。

结论

在PCNL中,硬性肾镜检查和吸引时额外的通道会显著影响RPP,但使用软性肾镜时不会。了解多通道和设备类型对RPP的影响可能会提高PCNL的安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验