Suppr超能文献

在急救调度中心使用qSOFA标准对脓毒症患者进行分诊:一项回顾性分析。

Triage of Septic Patients Using qSOFA Criteria at the SAMU Regulation: A Retrospective Analysis.

作者信息

Jouffroy R, Saade A, Carpentier A, Ellouze S, Philippe P, Idialisoa R, Carli P, Vivien B

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Jan-Feb;22(1):84-90. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1347733. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

One of the major prognostic factors in the management of sepsis is the early initiation of appropriate treatment. To serve this purpose, early identification and triage of patients are crucial steps, which are still not optimal. The objective of this study was to determine whether the quick Sequential (Sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is an accurate method for prehospital triaging of septic patients. We evaluated whether the use of qSOFA criteria collected by the Service Mobile d'Urgence et de Réanimation 15 (SAMU 15) regulation call center during prehospital care would facilitate appropriate intensive care unit (ICU) admission of patients with septic syndromes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational register-based study using data collected between April 01 and May 31 2011. These data are based on call registry reports of calls received by the Paris Emergency regulation call centre during prehospital management of patients. All patients with suspected infection were included in the study and evaluated using qSOFA and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. The primary outcome was Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission.

RESULTS

Among the 30 642 reports received, 141 patients with presumed sepsis were included. Twenty-two patients were admitted to an ICU. The qSOFA and SIRS scores were the same in predicting admission to an ICU (p = 0.26). The qSOFA had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 68% for ICU admission whereas the SIRS had a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 43%. At day 28, 12 patients (9%) had died, 5 of them in the ICU. The negative predictive value reached 93% and 94% for pre-hospital qSOFA and SIRS respectively. Pre-hospital systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤100 mmHg was significantly associated with ICU admission (OR = 4.19 [1.89-9.84]), while all other criteria were not.

CONCLUSION

The current study reports no difference between the SIRS and the qSOFA scores for prehospital triage of septic patients to predict ICU admission. Both scores have comparable, pertinent, negative predictive value for ICU admission. Nevertheless, an improved score for pre-hospital triaging is needed to predict ICU admission of septic patients.

摘要

目的

脓毒症治疗中主要的预后因素之一是尽早开始恰当治疗。为此,患者的早期识别和分流是关键步骤,但目前仍未达到最佳状态。本研究的目的是确定快速序贯(脓毒症相关)器官功能衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分是否是对脓毒症患者进行院前分流的准确方法。我们评估了在院前护理期间,由巴黎急救调度中心(SAMU 15)根据规定呼叫中心收集的qSOFA标准,是否有助于脓毒症综合征患者恰当地入住重症监护病房(ICU)。

方法

我们进行了一项基于回顾性观察登记的研究,使用2011年4月1日至5月31日期间收集的数据。这些数据基于巴黎急救调度中心在患者院前管理期间收到的呼叫登记报告。所有疑似感染的患者均纳入研究,并使用qSOFA和全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准进行评估。主要结局是入住重症监护病房(ICU)。

结果

在收到的30642份报告中,有141例疑似脓毒症患者被纳入。22例患者入住了ICU。qSOFA和SIRS评分在预测入住ICU方面相同(p = 0.26)。qSOFA对入住ICU的敏感性为75%,特异性为68%,而SIRS的敏感性为87%,特异性为43%。在第28天,12例患者(9%)死亡,其中5例在ICU死亡。院前qSOFA和SIRS的阴性预测值分别达到93%和94%。院前收缩压(SBP)≤100 mmHg与入住ICU显著相关(OR = 4.19 [1.89 - 9.84]),而其他所有标准均无此相关性。

结论

本研究报告称,在对脓毒症患者进行院前分流以预测入住ICU方面,SIRS和qSOFA评分之间没有差异。两种评分在预测入住ICU方面具有相当、相关的阴性预测价值。然而,需要一种改进的评分来预测脓毒症患者的ICU入住情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验