Wang Xiang, Wang Fang, Wang Haifeng, Li Nan
Clin Lab. 2017 Jul 1;63(7):1293-1300. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2017.161220.
Currently, it is not well understood how the contribution of basal versus postprandial plasma glucose changes in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with different treatment regimens. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting as well as postprandial blood glucose and to determine how these relationships changed during DM progression in Chinese diabetic patients with different treatment regimens.
Continuous glucose monitoring was conducted in 228 type 2 DM patients with stable glucose levels. They were divided into five groups according to the HbA1c quintile. The areas under the curve (AUCs) between the monitoring blood glucose curve and the target blood glucose curve (5.6 mmol/L) were measured.
Eighty-six (37.7%) patients were administered with an oral antihyperglycemic drug (OAD), 88 (38.6%) with basal insulin (BI), and 54 (23.7%) with premixed insulin (PI). There was a statistically significant increase in the fasting hyperglycemia contribution in patients with elevated ranges of HbA1c despite the treatment regimen (p < 0.05), and the opposite trend was observed in postprandial hyperglycemia. The contribution from fasting plasma glucose to total hyperglycemic exposure was significantly lower in patients using BI (55.6 ± 17.8%), compared with those using an OAD or PI (61.7 ± 14.2% and 82.2 ± 21.8%, respectively), when HbA1c ≥ 10%.
Optimal glycemic control may be achieved by the appropriate selection of agents that balance fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia. Patients with poorly controlled hyperglycemia may benefit more from a BI regimen by reducing the fasting hyperglycemia contribution.
目前,对于在2型糖尿病(DM)不同治疗方案中基础血糖与餐后血糖变化对治疗的贡献尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)与空腹及餐后血糖之间的关系,并确定在中国不同治疗方案的糖尿病患者中,这些关系在糖尿病进展过程中如何变化。
对228例血糖水平稳定的2型DM患者进行持续葡萄糖监测。根据HbA1c五分位数将他们分为五组。测量监测血糖曲线与目标血糖曲线(5.6 mmol/L)之间的曲线下面积(AUC)。
86例(37.7%)患者接受口服降糖药(OAD)治疗,88例(38.6%)接受基础胰岛素(BI)治疗,54例(23.7%)接受预混胰岛素(PI)治疗。尽管治疗方案不同,但HbA1c升高患者的空腹高血糖贡献有统计学显著增加(p < 0.05),餐后高血糖则呈现相反趋势。当HbA1c≥10%时,使用BI的患者空腹血糖对总高血糖暴露的贡献显著低于使用OAD或PI的患者(分别为55.6±17.8%、61.7±14.2%和82.2±21.8%)。
通过适当选择平衡空腹和餐后高血糖的药物可实现最佳血糖控制。血糖控制不佳的患者可能通过降低空腹高血糖贡献而从BI治疗方案中获益更多。