Desoutter Alban, Yusuf Solieman Osama, Subsol Gérard, Tassery Hervé, Cuisinier Frédéric, Fages Michel
Laboratoire Bioingénierie et Nanosciences, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Project-Team ICAR, Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0182206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182206. eCollection 2017.
In dentistry, 3D intra-oral scanners are gaining increasing popularity essentially for the production of dental prostheses. However, there is no normalized procedure to evaluate their basic performance and enable comparisons among intra-oral scanners. The noise value highlights the trueness of a 3D intra-oral scanner and its capacity to plan prosthesis with efficient clinical precision. The aim of the present study is to develop a reproducible methodology for determining the noise of an intra-oral scanner. To this aim, and as a reference, an ultra-flat and ultra-smooth alumina wafer is used as a blank test. The roughness is calculated using an AFM (atomic force microscope) and interferometric microscope measurements to validate this ultra-flat characteristic. Then, two intra-oral scanners (Carestream CS3500 and Trios 3Shape) are used. The wafer is imaged by the two intra-oral scanners with three different angles and two different directions, 10 times for each parameter, given a total of 50 3D-meshes per intra-oral scanner. RMS (root mean square), representing the noise, is evaluated and compared for each angle/direction and each intra-oral scanner, for the whole mesh, and then in a central ROI (region of interest). In this study, we obtained RMS values ranging between 5.29 and 12.58 micrometers. No statistically significant differences were found between the mean RMS of the two intra-oral scanners, but significant differences in angulation and orientations were found between different 3D intra-oral scanners. This study shows that the evaluation of RMS can be an indicator of the value of the noise, which can be easily assessed by applying the present methodology.
在牙科领域,3D口腔内扫描仪因其在制作牙科修复体方面的应用而越来越受欢迎。然而,目前尚无标准化程序来评估其基本性能并实现不同口腔内扫描仪之间的比较。噪声值突出了3D口腔内扫描仪的准确性及其以高效临床精度规划修复体的能力。本研究的目的是开发一种可重复的方法来确定口腔内扫描仪的噪声。为此,作为参考,使用超平且超光滑的氧化铝晶圆进行空白测试。通过原子力显微镜(AFM)和干涉显微镜测量来计算粗糙度,以验证这种超平特性。然后,使用两台口腔内扫描仪(Carestream CS3500和Trios 3Shape)。该晶圆由两台口腔内扫描仪以三种不同角度和两个不同方向进行成像,每个参数成像10次,每台口腔内扫描仪共生成50个3D网格。针对每个角度/方向以及每台口腔内扫描仪,对整个网格以及中央感兴趣区域(ROI)评估并比较代表噪声的均方根(RMS)值。在本研究中,我们获得的RMS值范围在5.29至12.58微米之间。两台口腔内扫描仪的平均RMS之间未发现统计学上的显著差异,但不同的3D口腔内扫描仪在角度和方向上存在显著差异。本研究表明,RMS评估可以作为噪声值的一个指标,通过应用本方法可以轻松进行评估。