Beck Marcus, Wust Peter, Barelkowski Tomasz, Kaul David, Thieme Alexander-Henry, Wecker Sascha, Wlodarczyk Waldemar, Budach Volker, Ghadjar Pirus
Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Aug 10;12(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0862-4.
Postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) in T3 and R1 prostate cancer as well as salvage radiation therapy (SRT) in case of postoperative biochemical failure (BF) are established treatments. Dose-intensified postoperative radiation therapy (RT) schemes have shown superior biochemical control accompanied by increased toxicity rates. In our study we evaluate a novel risk adapted dose-intensified postoperative RT scheme.
A consecutive series of prostate cancer patients receiving postoperative RT after radical prostatectomy using helical Tomotherapy between 04/2012 and 04/2015 was analyzed retrospectively. RT was administered using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the area at risk (37 fractions of 1.9 Gy, total dose: 70.3 Gy) being defined based on histopathological findings (T3/R1 region) and in few cases according to additional diagnostic imaging. The whole prostate bed was treated with a dose of 66.6 Gy (37 fractions of 1.8 Gy). Primary endpoints were acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities. Secondary endpoints included patient reported outcome as assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the International Consultation on Incontinence questionnaire (ICIQ) and prostate cancer specific Quality of Life questionnaire QLQ-PR25, as well as rates of BF.
A total of 69 patients were analyzed. Sixteen patients underwent ART and 53 patients SRT, respectively. The median follow-up was 20 months (range, 8-41 months). Seven (10.1%) and four (5.8%) patients experienced acute grade 2 GU and GI toxicity. Two patients (2.9%) had late grade 2 GU toxicity, whereas no late grade 2 GI nor any grade 3 acute or late GU or GI events were observed. When compared to the baseline IPSS scores (p = 1.0) and ICIQ scores (p = 0.87) were not significantly different at the end of follow-up. Patient reported Quality of life (QoL) showed also no significant difference. A total of seven patients (10.1%) experienced a biochemical recurrence with the 2-year biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) being 91%.
Postoperative RT for prostate cancer patients with a risk adapted dose-intensified SIB using helical tomotherapy is feasible and associated with favorable acute and late GU and GI toxicity rates, no significant change of IPSS-, ICIQ scores and patient reported QoL and results in promising bPFS rates.
T3期和R1期前列腺癌的术后辅助放疗(ART)以及术后生化复发(BF)时的挽救性放疗(SRT)均为既定治疗方法。剂量强化的术后放疗(RT)方案已显示出更好的生化控制效果,但毒性发生率增加。在我们的研究中,我们评估了一种新的根据风险调整的剂量强化术后RT方案。
回顾性分析了2012年4月至2015年4月期间使用螺旋断层放疗进行前列腺癌根治术后接受术后RT的一系列连续患者。根据组织病理学结果(T3/R1区域)并在少数情况下根据额外的诊断成像确定,对高危区域采用同步整合加量(SIB)进行RT(1.9 Gy,37次,总剂量:70.3 Gy)。整个前列腺床接受66.6 Gy(1.8 Gy,37次)的剂量照射。主要终点是急性和晚期泌尿生殖系统(GU)及胃肠道(GI)毒性。次要终点包括通过国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、国际尿失禁咨询问卷(ICIQ)和前列腺癌特异性生活质量问卷QLQ-PR25评估的患者报告结局,以及BF发生率。
共分析了69例患者。分别有16例患者接受了ART,53例患者接受了SRT。中位随访时间为20个月(范围8 - 41个月)。7例(10.1%)和4例(5.8%)患者发生急性2级GU和GI毒性。2例患者(2.9%)发生晚期2级GU毒性,而未观察到晚期2级GI毒性以及任何3级急性或晚期GU或GI事件。与基线相比,随访结束时IPSS评分(p = 1.0)和ICIQ评分(p = 0.87)无显著差异。患者报告的生活质量(QoL)也无显著差异。共有7例患者(10.1%)发生生化复发,2年生化无进展生存率(bPFS)为91%。
对于前列腺癌患者,采用螺旋断层放疗进行根据风险调整剂量强化的SIB术后RT是可行的,且与良好的急性和晚期GU及GI毒性发生率相关,IPSS、ICIQ评分及患者报告的QoL无显著变化,并产生了有前景的bPFS率。