Bahadur Sardar, McRann J, McGilloway E
Department of Neuro-rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre Headley Court, Epsom, Surrey, UK.
J R Army Med Corps. 2017 Aug 9. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2016-000703.
Returning to employment is a major modifiable factor affecting long-term health in brain injury which neurological and vocational rehabilitation attempts to address. In military patients, little is known about long-term employability, whether employment is sustained and how they fare in civilian roles.
A telephone review was undertaken of every military patient having undergone inpatient neurorehabilitation between 2012 and 2014. This was compared to their employment outcomes one to three years post discharge. We further evaluated whether this employment was sustained over successive years in the same patients. Finally, we identify those rehabilitation interventions deemed most influential in improving employment outcomes in brain injury.
During this period, an average of 57 (51-61) such patients were discharged each year. A review conducted by telephone successfully contacted 46% (43%-49% across cohorts) of all possible patients; 71.4% (64-81) returned to work increasing to 80.7% (76-85) including those training/actively seeking-work. Overall, 31.7% (24-40) returned to full-time military-in those leaving, 89.6% (85.4-90.9) were discharged for medical reasons. Severity of brain injury was unrelated to successful employment; 63.6%/78.6% had the same vocational outcome over two consecutive years while 36.3%/21.4% showed improved outcomes.
Despite significant brain/neurological injury (graded by severity/Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory 4), 80.7% (76-85) were working/training 2/3 years postdischarge from neurorehabilitation with 31.7% returning to full-time military role. Inability to continue within the military was not synonymous with inability to work. Return to work was independent of severity of brain/neurological injury and follow-up over consecutive years demonstrated sustained employment. The argument against inpatient neurorehabilitation has always been cost> This 3-year analysis reinforces that patients can and most likely will return to employment with all the benefits this brings to person/family/society. Vocational rehabilitation is therefore recommended for all brain/neurological injury.
重返工作岗位是影响脑损伤患者长期健康的一个主要可改变因素,神经和职业康复旨在解决这一问题。对于军事患者,人们对其长期就业能力、就业能否持续以及他们在 civilian 岗位上的表现知之甚少。
对 2012 年至 2014 年间接受住院神经康复治疗的每位军事患者进行电话回访。将回访结果与他们出院后一至三年的就业情况进行比较。我们进一步评估了同一批患者的就业情况在连续几年中是否持续。最后,我们确定了那些被认为对改善脑损伤患者就业结果最有影响力的康复干预措施。
在此期间,每年平均有 57(51 - 61)名此类患者出院。通过电话回访成功联系到了所有可能患者的 46%(各队列中为 43% - 49%);71.4%(64 - 81)的患者重返工作岗位,若将那些正在接受培训/积极找工作的患者包括在内,这一比例增至 80.7%(76 - 85)。总体而言,31.7%(24 - 40)的患者重返全职军事岗位——在那些离开军队的患者中,89.6%(85.4 - 90.9)因医疗原因退伍。脑损伤的严重程度与就业成功与否无关;63.6%/78.6%的患者在连续两年中职业结果相同,而 36.3%/21.4%的患者表现出改善的结果。
尽管存在严重的脑/神经损伤(根据严重程度/梅奥波特兰适应性量表 4 分级),但 80.7%(76 - 85)的患者在神经康复出院后 2/3 年时正在工作/接受培训,31.7%的患者重返全职军事岗位。无法继续留在军队并不等同于无法工作。重返工作岗位与脑/神经损伤的严重程度无关,连续多年的随访表明就业情况持续良好。反对住院神经康复的观点一直是费用问题> 这项为期 3 年的分析强化了患者能够而且很可能会重返工作岗位,这会给个人/家庭/社会带来诸多益处。因此,建议对所有脑/神经损伤患者进行职业康复。