Loss-of-Function Variants: True Monogenic Culprits of Long-QT Syndrome or Proarrhythmic Variants Requiring Secondary Provocation?

BACKGROUND

Insight into type 6 long-QT syndrome (LQT6), stemming from mutations in the -encoded voltage-gated channel β-subunit, is limited. We sought to further characterize its clinical phenotype.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Individuals with reported pathogenic mutations identified during arrhythmia evaluation were collected from inherited arrhythmia clinics and the Rochester long-QT syndrome (LQTS) registry. Previously reported LQT6 cases were identified through a search of the MEDLINE database. Clinical features were assessed, while reported mutations were evaluated for genotype-phenotype segregation and classified according to the contemporary American College of Medical Genetics guidelines. Twenty-seven probands possessed reported pathogenic mutations, while a MEDLINE search identified 17 additional LQT6 cases providing clinical and genetic data. Sixteen probands had normal resting QTc values and only developed QT prolongation and malignant arrhythmias after exposure to QT-prolonging stressors, 10 had other LQTS pathogenic mutations, and 10 did not have an LQTS phenotype. Although the remaining 8 subjects had an LQTS phenotype, evidence suggested that the variant was not the underlying culprit. The collective frequency of variants implicated in LQT6 in the Exome Aggregation Consortium database was 1.4%, in comparison with a 0.0005% estimated clinical prevalence for LQT6.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of clinical phenotype, the high allelic frequencies of LQT6 mutations in the Exome Aggregation Consortium database, and absence of previous documentation of genotype-phenotype segregation, our findings suggest that many variants, and perhaps all, have been erroneously designated as LQTS-causative mutations. Instead, variants may confer proarrhythmic susceptibility when provoked by additional environmental/acquired or genetic factors, or both.