• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Therapeutic choice in the treatment of hypertension. Initial treatment of newly diagnosed hypertension and secular trends in the prescribing of antihypertensive medications for Medicaid patients.

作者信息

Ray W A, Schaffner W, Oates J A

出版信息

Am J Med. 1986 Dec 31;81(6C):9-16. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90522-x.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(86)90522-x
PMID:2879456
Abstract

A "stepped-care" approach has been widely recommended for more than 10 years as an empiric method for the treatment of hypertension. This approach encourages the use of diuretics or beta blockers as initial monotherapy for hypertension. Although these and other antihypertensive regimens tested in clinical trials have substantially reduced morbidity and mortality from cerebrovascular disease, their relative effectiveness in reducing the sequelae of coronary artery disease is not as well established. These findings, coupled with the development of new drug regimens, have led to a re-examination of the stepped-care guidelines. This re-examination will stimulate increased interest in the therapeutic choices made by practicing physicians, particularly because the newer drugs are more costly than the traditional treatments. To address this question, we performed two specific studies, using data bases from Michigan and Tennessee Medicaid programs. The first study analyzed prescriptions for newly diagnosed cases of essential hypertension. The second study analyzed secular trends in the prescribing of antihypertensive regimens since that time. The data suggest that in 1982 and 1983 (the time period under consideration in the first part of the study), physicians treating hypertension for Medicaid enrollees followed the stepped-care recommendations, the majority using diuretics as step-one monotherapy. The secular trend data in the second study showed a moderate decrease in the use of diuretics since 1983. There were marked increases in the use of newer antihypertensive medications such as calcium channel blockers and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor captopril. Because the costs of the newer drugs are substantially higher, a shift to these drugs would significantly increase the cost of treating hypertension in this country. Prospective, controlled trials are necessary to ascertain if the increased costs of the newly developed drugs are justified by potential benefits.

摘要

相似文献

1
Therapeutic choice in the treatment of hypertension. Initial treatment of newly diagnosed hypertension and secular trends in the prescribing of antihypertensive medications for Medicaid patients.
Am J Med. 1986 Dec 31;81(6C):9-16. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90522-x.
2
Antihypertensive drug prescription trends at the primary health care centres in Bahrain.巴林初级卫生保健中心的抗高血压药物处方趋势
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 May;10(3):219-27. doi: 10.1002/pds.578.
3
Initial medication selection for treatment of hypertension in an open-panel HMO.
J Am Board Fam Pract. 1995 Jan-Feb;8(1):1-6.
4
Trends in antihypertensive drug use in the United States: do the JNC V recommendations affect prescribing? Fifth Joint National Commission on the Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.美国抗高血压药物使用趋势:美国国家高血压检测、评估与治疗联合委员会第五次报告的建议是否影响处方用药?第五届全国高血压检测、评估与治疗联合委员会
JAMA. 1997 Dec 3;278(21):1745-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.21.1745.
5
Impact of two Medicaid prior-authorization policies on antihypertensive use and costs among Michigan and Indiana residents dually enrolled in Medicaid and Medicare: results of a longitudinal, population-based study.密歇根州和印第安纳州同时参加医疗补助和医疗保险的居民中,两项医疗补助事先授权政策对降压药使用和成本的影响:一项基于人群的纵向研究结果。
Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):729-41; discussion 716. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.007.
6
Long-term and short-term changes in antihypertensive prescribing by office-based physicians in the United States.美国门诊医生抗高血压药物处方的长期和短期变化。
Hypertension. 2006 Aug;48(2):213-8. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000229653.73128.b6. Epub 2006 Jun 19.
7
Misperceptions about beta-blockers and diuretics: a national survey of primary care physicians.关于β受体阻滞剂和利尿剂的误解:一项针对基层医疗医生的全国性调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Dec;18(12):977-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.20414.x.
8
Changes in the phamacologic treatment of hypertension in the Department of Veterans Affairs 1997-1999: decreased use of calcium antagonists and increased use of beta-blockers and thiazide diuretics.1997 - 1999年退伍军人事务部高血压药物治疗的变化:钙拮抗剂使用减少,β受体阻滞剂和噻嗪类利尿剂使用增加。
Am J Hypertens. 2001 Sep;14(9 Pt 1):957-62. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(01)02185-9.
9
How well have practices followed guidelines in prescribing antihypertensive drugs: the role of health insurance.医疗机构在开具抗高血压药物时遵循指南的情况如何:医疗保险的作用。
Value Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;6(1):18-28. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.00212.x.
10
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in clinical practice. A re-examination of stepped-care: a retrospective and a prospective.临床实践中的血管紧张素转换酶抑制作用。阶梯式治疗的重新审视:一项回顾性和前瞻性研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1985;7 Suppl 1:S126-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic competition as an exploratory model of healthcare policy for the antihypertensive market.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Sep;10(3):251-61. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610030-00006.
2
Economic factors in the initiation of antihypertensive therapy.启动抗高血压治疗的经济因素。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Oct;2(4):324-34. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199202040-00007.
3
Changing patterns of antihypertensive drug use in a German population between 1984 and 1987. Results of a population based cohort study in the Federal Republic of Germany.1984年至1987年间德国人群中抗高血压药物使用模式的变化。德意志联邦共和国一项基于人群的队列研究结果。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;39(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02657047.
4
Lowering the cost of lowering the cholesterol: a formulary policy for lovastatin.降低降低胆固醇的成本:一项关于洛伐他汀的处方政策。
J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Nov-Dec;5(6):459-63. doi: 10.1007/BF02600868.
5
Reserpine: a relic from the past or a neglected drug of the present for achieving cost containment in treating hypertension?利血平:是过去的遗留物还是当下为控制高血压治疗成本而被忽视的药物?
J Gen Intern Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;6(6):561-72. doi: 10.1007/BF02598229.
6
Clinical trials and clinical practice in the elderly. A focus on hypertension.
Drugs Aging. 1992 Mar-Apr;2(2):86-94. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199202020-00002.