• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤基质比在原发性可手术浸润性乳腺癌中的预后价值:一项验证性研究。

The prognostic value of the tumour-stroma ratio in primary operable invasive cancer of the breast: a validation study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Nov;166(2):435-445. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4445-8. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-017-4445-8
PMID:28795248
Abstract

PURPOSE

The primary aim of the current study is to validate the prognostic relevance of the relative amount of tumour-associated stroma, the tumour-stroma ratio, in a large cohort of primary operable breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on women diagnosed and treated for primarily operable invasive breast cancer in the period from 1 January 1990 till 31 December 1999. Tumour-stroma ratio was estimated by microscopic evaluation of haematoxylin and eosin tumour slides. Two independent observers (k = 0.68) performed tumour-stroma ratio evaluation in a significant part of the cohort. The prognostic potential with respect to overall, recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of n = 737 women were evaluated. Median follow-up time was 11.5 years. High stromal content was an independent prognosticator for worse overall (hazard ratio 1.56, p = 0.002, 95% confidence interval 1.18-2.05), distant metastasis-free (hazard ratio 1.52, p = 0.008, 95% confidence interval 1.12-2.06) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 1.35, p = 0.046, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.81). In subgroups of hormone receptor-positive and lymph node-negative cases, high stromal content was also an independent prognosticator for worse outcome.

CONCLUSION

Tumour-stroma ratio is an independent risk factor for worse overall, distant metastasis-free and recurrence-free survival in primarily operable breast cancer. However, detailed prospective studies with respect to tumour-stroma ratio are necessary to gain more insight in its prognostic potential in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是在一个大型原发性可手术乳腺癌患者队列中验证肿瘤相关基质的相对量(肿瘤-基质比)的预后相关性。

方法

对 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 1999 年 12 月 31 日期间诊断和治疗原发性可手术浸润性乳腺癌的女性进行了回顾性队列研究。通过苏木精和伊红肿瘤切片的显微镜评估来估计肿瘤-基质比。两名独立观察者(k=0.68)在队列的重要部分进行了肿瘤-基质比评估。评估了与总生存、无复发生存和无远处转移生存相关的预后潜力。

结果

共评估了 737 名女性。中位随访时间为 11.5 年。高基质含量是总生存(风险比 1.56,p=0.002,95%置信区间 1.18-2.05)、无远处转移生存(风险比 1.52,p=0.008,95%置信区间 1.12-2.06)和无复发生存(风险比 1.35,p=0.046,95%置信区间 1.01-1.81)的独立预后因素。在激素受体阳性和淋巴结阴性病例亚组中,高基质含量也是总生存、无远处转移生存和无复发生存较差的独立预后因素。

结论

肿瘤-基质比是原发性可手术乳腺癌总生存、无远处转移生存和无复发生存的独立危险因素。然而,需要进行详细的前瞻性研究,以进一步了解其在临床实践中的预后潜力。

相似文献

1
The prognostic value of the tumour-stroma ratio in primary operable invasive cancer of the breast: a validation study.肿瘤基质比在原发性可手术浸润性乳腺癌中的预后价值:一项验证性研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Nov;166(2):435-445. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4445-8. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
2
The relationship between the tumour stroma percentage, clinicopathological characteristics and outcome in patients with operable ductal breast cancer.可手术切除的导管型乳腺癌患者的肿瘤间质百分比、临床病理特征与预后之间的关系。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Jul 8;111(1):157-65. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.279. Epub 2014 May 29.
3
The prognostic value of tumour-stroma ratio in triple-negative breast cancer.肿瘤间质比在三阴性乳腺癌中的预后价值。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr;38(4):307-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
4
The prognostic value of tumor-stroma ratio in tumor-positive axillary lymph nodes of breast cancer patients.肿瘤-基质比率在乳腺癌患者肿瘤阳性腋窝淋巴结中的预后价值。
Int J Cancer. 2018 Dec 15;143(12):3194-3200. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31658. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
Prognostic significance of the tumor-stroma ratio: validation study in node-negative premenopausal breast cancer patients from the EORTC perioperative chemotherapy (POP) trial (10854).肿瘤间质比的预后意义:来自 EORTC 围手术期化疗(POP)试验(10854)的淋巴结阴性绝经前乳腺癌患者的验证研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun;139(2):371-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2571-5. Epub 2013 May 25.
6
TGF-beta receptor 2 downregulation in tumour-associated stroma worsens prognosis and high-grade tumours show more tumour-associated macrophages and lower TGF-beta1 expression in colon carcinoma: a retrospective study.肿瘤相关基质中转化生长因子β受体2下调会恶化预后,且高级别肿瘤在结肠癌中显示出更多肿瘤相关巨噬细胞和更低的转化生长因子β1表达:一项回顾性研究
BMC Cancer. 2007 Aug 10;7:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-156.
7
Tumor-stroma ratio in the primary tumor is a prognostic factor in early breast cancer patients, especially in triple-negative carcinoma patients.原发肿瘤的肿瘤间质比是早期乳腺癌患者的预后因素,尤其是三阴性乳腺癌患者。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Feb;125(3):687-96. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0855-6. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
8
Prognostic impact of tumour-stroma ratio in early-stage oral tongue cancers.早期口腔舌癌中肿瘤间质比的预后影响。
Histopathology. 2018 Jun;72(7):1128-1135. doi: 10.1111/his.13481. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
9
The prognostic value of the tumor-stroma ratio is most discriminative in patients with grade III or triple-negative breast cancer.肿瘤间质比在 III 级或三阴性乳腺癌患者中的预后价值最具鉴别性。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Apr 15;146(8):2296-2304. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32857. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
10
Tumour-stroma ratio has poor prognostic value in nonpedunculated T1 colorectal cancer: A multicentre case-cohort study.肿瘤-间质比在无蒂T1期结直肠癌中预后价值不佳:一项多中心病例队列研究
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Feb 10. doi: 10.1177/2050640620975324.

引用本文的文献

1
Tumor-stroma type and tumor-stroma ratio predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer.肿瘤-基质类型和肿瘤-基质比率可预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗反应。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 Mar 31;71(2):e20241225. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20241225. eCollection 2025.
2
The prognostic value of the tumor-stroma ratio compared to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer: a review.三阴性乳腺癌中肿瘤-基质比与肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞相比的预后价值:综述
Virchows Arch. 2025 Mar;486(3):427-444. doi: 10.1007/s00428-025-04039-z. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
3
Inverse correlation between the amounts of lymphocytic infiltrate and stroma in breast carcinoma.
乳腺癌中淋巴细胞浸润量与间质量之间的负相关。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 9;10(22):e40295. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40295. eCollection 2024 Nov 30.
4
Geometric characteristics of stromal collagen fibres in breast cancer using differential interference contrast microscopy.利用微分干涉差显微镜观察乳腺癌中基质胶原纤维的几何特征
J Microsc. 2025 Feb;297(2):135-152. doi: 10.1111/jmi.13361. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
5
The Role of Tumor Parenchymal and Stromal Ratios in Colorectal Cancer.肿瘤实质与间质比例在结直肠癌中的作用
J Family Reprod Health. 2024 Mar;18(1):1-8. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v18i1.15433.
6
Investigation of the Relationship Between Tumor Microenvironment and Prognostic Parameters in Invasive Breast Carcinomas of No Special Type: A Retrospective Analysis.探讨非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌肿瘤微环境与预后参数的关系:一项回顾性分析。
Turk Patoloji Derg. 2024;40(3):170-180. doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2024.12805.
7
Automatic quantification of tumor-stroma ratio as a prognostic marker for pancreatic cancer.自动量化肿瘤-基质比作为胰腺癌的预后标志物。
PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0301969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301969. eCollection 2024.
8
Gene expression in metastatic breast cancer-patterns in primary tumors and metastatic tissue with prognostic potential.转移性乳腺癌中的基因表达——原发性肿瘤和具有预后潜力的转移组织中的模式
Front Mol Biosci. 2024 Feb 21;10:1343979. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1343979. eCollection 2023.
9
Utility of Indigenously Developed Square Grid Method for Evaluation of Tumor-Stroma Ratio and Stromal Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Pilot Study.本土研发的方格法在评估浸润性乳腺癌肿瘤-基质比及基质肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞中的应用:一项初步研究
Iran J Pathol. 2023 Summer;18(3):335-346. doi: 10.30699/IJP.2023.1989528.3063. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
10
Combining the tumor-stroma ratio with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes improves the prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer patients.将肿瘤基质比与肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞相结合,可提高乳腺癌患者病理完全缓解预测的准确性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Nov;202(1):173-183. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07026-7. Epub 2023 Aug 1.