• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种高效的肾脏分配问题方法:基于可信度的模糊共同权重数据包络分析方法。

An efficient method for kidney allocation problem: a credibility-based fuzzy common weights data envelopment analysis approach.

机构信息

School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Dec;21(4):587-603. doi: 10.1007/s10729-017-9414-6. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10729-017-9414-6
PMID:28795254
Abstract

Given the perennial imbalance and chronic scarcity between the demand for and supply of available organs, organ allocation is one of the most critical decisions in the management of organ transplantation networks. Organ allocation systems undergo rapid revisions for the sake of improved outcomes in terms of both equity and medical efficiency. This paper presents a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-based model to evaluate the efficiency of possible patient-organ pairs for kidney allocation in order to enhance the fitness of organ allocation under inherent uncertainty in such problem. Eligible patient-kidney pairs are regarded as decision making units (DMUs) in a Credibility-based Fuzzy Common Weights DEA (CFCWDEA) approach and are ranked based on efficiency scores. Using a common set of weights for all DMUs ensures a high degree of fairness in the assessment and ranking of DMUs. The proposed model is also the first allocation method capable of coping with the vague and intervallic medical and nonmedical allocation factors by the aid of fuzzy programming. Verification and validation of the proposed approach are performed in two steps using a real case study from the Iranian kidney allocation system. First, the superiority of the proposed deterministic model in enhancing allocation outcomes is demonstrated and analyzed. Second, the applicability of the proposed fuzzy DEA method is demonstrated using a series of data realizations for different credibility levels.

摘要

鉴于可用器官的需求与供应之间长期存在的不平衡和慢性短缺,器官分配是器官移植网络管理中最关键的决策之一。为了提高公平性和医疗效率方面的结果,器官分配系统正在进行快速修订。本文提出了一种基于数据包络分析(DEA)的模型,用于评估肾脏分配中可能的患者-器官对的效率,以增强在该问题固有不确定性下的器官分配的适应性。合格的患者-肾脏对被视为信誉度为基础的模糊共同权重数据包络分析(CFCWDEA)方法中的决策单元(DMU),并根据效率得分进行排名。为所有 DMU 使用共同的权重集确保了 DMU 的评估和排名具有高度的公平性。所提出的模型也是第一个能够通过模糊编程来处理模糊和区间医疗和非医疗分配因素的分配方法。使用来自伊朗肾脏分配系统的实际案例研究分两步验证和验证所提出的方法。首先,证明和分析了所提出的确定性模型在增强分配结果方面的优越性。其次,使用不同可信度水平的一系列数据实现证明了所提出的模糊 DEA 方法的适用性。

相似文献

1
An efficient method for kidney allocation problem: a credibility-based fuzzy common weights data envelopment analysis approach.一种高效的肾脏分配问题方法:基于可信度的模糊共同权重数据包络分析方法。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Dec;21(4):587-603. doi: 10.1007/s10729-017-9414-6. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
2
A novel two-stage network data envelopment analysis model for kidney allocation problem under medical and logistical uncertainty: a real case study.一种用于医疗和后勤不确定性下肾脏分配问题的新型两阶段网络数据包络分析模型:一个实际案例研究
Health Care Manag Sci. 2024 Dec;27(4):555-579. doi: 10.1007/s10729-024-09683-6. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
Identification and weighting of kidney allocation criteria: a novel multi-expert fuzzy method.鉴定和加权肾脏分配标准:一种新的多专家模糊方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Sep 6;19(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0892-y.
4
Z-number network data envelopment analysis approach: A case study on the Iranian insurance industry.Z -number 网络数据包络分析方法:伊朗保险业的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0306876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306876. eCollection 2024.
5
Malmquist productivity index for two-stage network systems under data uncertainty: A real-world case study.两阶段网络系统在数据不确定性下的 Malmquist 生产力指数:一个实际案例研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307277. eCollection 2024.
6
Demand, supply and allocation in Eurotransplant.欧洲器官移植组织中的需求、供应与分配
Ann Transplant. 1997;2(1):26-33.
7
Ranking patients on the kidney transplant waiting list based on fuzzy inference system.根据模糊推理系统对肾移植等候名单上的患者进行排名。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Jan 15;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02662-5.
8
Fuzzy organ allocation system for cadaveric kidney transplantation.用于尸体肾移植的模糊器官分配系统。
Transplantation. 2005 Dec 27;80(12):1648-53. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000183287.04630.05.
9
Sustainable feedstocks selection and renewable products allocation: A new hybrid adaptive utility-based consensus model.可持续饲料选择和可再生产品分配:一种新的混合自适应基于效用的共识模型。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110428. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110428. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
10
Performance Evaluation of Hospitals under Data Uncertainty: An Uncertain Common-Weights Data Envelopment Analysis.数据不确定性下医院的绩效评估:一种不确定共同权重数据包络分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 7;12(6):611. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060611.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance Evaluation of Hospitals under Data Uncertainty: An Uncertain Common-Weights Data Envelopment Analysis.数据不确定性下医院的绩效评估:一种不确定共同权重数据包络分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 7;12(6):611. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060611.
2
Israeli Medical Experts' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Preferences in Allocating Donor Organs for Transplantation.以色列医学专家在器官分配移植方面的知识、态度和偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 6;19(11):6945. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116945.
3
Ranking patients on the kidney transplant waiting list based on fuzzy inference system.

本文引用的文献

1
Productivity and quality of Dutch hospitals during system reform.荷兰医院在体制改革期间的生产率与质量
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Sep;19(3):279-90. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9321-7. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
2
Outlook of organ transplantation in Iran: time for quality assessment.伊朗器官移植的前景:进行质量评估的时候了。
Iran J Kidney Dis. 2014 May;8(3):185-8.
3
The logistics management and coordination in procurement phase of organ transplantation.器官移植采购阶段的物流管理与协调
根据模糊推理系统对肾移植等候名单上的患者进行排名。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Jan 15;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02662-5.
4
Identification and weighting of kidney allocation criteria: a novel multi-expert fuzzy method.鉴定和加权肾脏分配标准:一种新的多专家模糊方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Sep 6;19(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0892-y.
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2008 Dec;216(4):287-96. doi: 10.1620/tjem.216.287.
4
The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery.医疗服务提供的效率和生产率的衡量。
Health Econ. 2008 Oct;17(10):1107-28. doi: 10.1002/hec.1391.
5
Calculating life years from transplant (LYFT): methods for kidney and kidney-pancreas candidates.计算移植后的生命年数(LYFT):肾和肾胰联合移植候选者的方法
Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):997-1011. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02177.x.
6
Worldwide cadaveric organ donation systems (transplant organ procurement).全球尸体器官捐献系统(移植器官获取)
Urol J. 2004 Summer;1(3):157-64.
7
A new organ transplantation location-allocation policy: a case study of Italy.一项新的器官移植地点分配政策:以意大利为例的案例研究。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2006 May;9(2):125-42. doi: 10.1007/s10729-006-7661-z.
8
Simulating the allocation of organs for transplantation.模拟器官移植的分配
Health Care Manag Sci. 2004 Nov;7(4):331-8. doi: 10.1007/s10729-004-7541-3.
9
A methodological framework for optimally reorganizing liver transplant regions.优化肝移植区域重组的方法框架。
Med Decis Making. 2005 Jan-Feb;25(1):35-46. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04273137.
10
Should everyone have equal access to organ transplantation? An argument in favor.每个人都应有平等的器官移植机会吗?支持该观点的一则论据。
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Sep 8;163(16):1883-5; discussion 1885. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.16.1883.