Jaiswal Nishant, Singh Meenu, Agarwal Amit, Thumburu Kiran K
ICMR Advanced Centre for Evidence-Based Child Health, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh, India, 160012.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 10;8(8):CD011855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011855.pub2.
Cystic fibrosis is a life-limiting autosomal recessive genetic illness. A feeling of shortness of breath is common in cystic fibrosis, especially as the disease progresses. Reversing the underlying cause is the priority when treating breathlessness (dyspnoea), but when it is not feasible, palliation (easing) becomes the primary goal to improve an individual's quality of life. A range of drugs administered by various routes have been used, but no definite guidelines are available. A systematic review is needed to evaluate such treatments.
To assess the efficacy and safety of drugs used to ease breathlessness in people with cystic fibrosis.
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books.Date of last search: 24 July 2017.We searched databases (clinicaltrials.gov, the ISRCTN registry, the Clinical Trials Registry India and WHO ICTRP) for ongoing trials. These searches were last run on 31 July 2017.
We planned to include randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials in people with cystic fibrosis (diagnosed by a positive sweat chloride test or genetic testing) who have breathlessness. We considered studies comparing any drugs used for easing breathlessness to another drug administered by any route (inhaled (nebulised), intravenous, oral, subcutaneous, transmucosal (including buccal, sublingual and intra-nasal) and transdermal).
The authors assessed the search results according to the pre-defined inclusion criteria.
The search yielded only one study (cross-over in design), which did not fulfil the inclusion criteria as no data were available from the first treatment period alone.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Due to the lack of available evidence, this review cannot provide any information for clinical practice. The authors call for specific research in this area after taking into account relevant ethical considerations. The research should focus on the efficacy and safety of the drugs with efficacy being measured in terms of improvement in quality of life, dyspnoea scores and hospital stay.
囊性纤维化是一种危及生命的常染色体隐性遗传病。呼吸急促的感觉在囊性纤维化患者中很常见,尤其是随着疾病的进展。治疗呼吸困难(气短)时,首要任务是消除潜在病因,但当这不可行时,缓解症状就成为改善患者生活质量的主要目标。人们已经使用了多种通过不同途径给药的药物,但尚无明确的指导原则。需要进行系统评价来评估此类治疗方法。
评估用于缓解囊性纤维化患者呼吸困难的药物的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了Cochrane囊性纤维化试验注册库,该注册库通过电子数据库检索以及对期刊和会议摘要集的手工检索汇编而成。最后一次检索日期:2017年7月24日。我们检索了数据库(clinicaltrials.gov、ISRCTN注册库、印度临床试验注册库和世界卫生组织国际临床试验平台)以查找正在进行的试验。这些检索最后一次运行于2017年7月31日。
我们计划纳入患有呼吸困难的囊性纤维化患者(通过汗液氯化物试验阳性或基因检测确诊)的随机对照试验和半随机对照试验。我们考虑比较任何用于缓解呼吸困难的药物与通过任何途径(吸入(雾化)、静脉注射、口服、皮下注射、经粘膜(包括颊部、舌下和鼻内)和透皮)给药的另一种药物的研究。
作者根据预先定义的纳入标准评估检索结果。
检索仅得到一项研究(交叉设计),但该研究不符合纳入标准,因为仅第一个治疗期没有可用数据。
由于缺乏可用证据,本综述无法为临床实践提供任何信息。作者呼吁在考虑相关伦理因素后,针对该领域开展具体研究。研究应聚焦于药物的疗效和安全性,疗效可通过生活质量改善、呼吸困难评分和住院时间来衡量。