Xie Wanling, Regan Meredith M, Buyse Marc, Halabi Susan, Kantoff Philip W, Sartor Oliver, Soule Howard, Clarke Noel W, Collette Laurence, Dignam James J, Fizazi Karim, Paruleker Wendy R, Sandler Howard M, Sydes Matthew R, Tombal Bertrand, Williams Scott G, Sweeney Christopher J
Wanling Xie, Meredith M. Regan, and Christopher J. Sweeney, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Marc Buyse, International Drug Development Institute; Bertrand Tombal, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve; Laurence Collette, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Susan Halabi, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Philip W. Kantoff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oliver Sartor, Tulane Medical School, New Orleans, LA; Howard Soule, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica; Howard M. Sandler, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Noel W. Clarke, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester; Matthew R. Sydes, University College London, London, United Kingdom; James J. Dignam, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Karim Fizazi, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France; Wendy R. Paruleker, Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; and Scott G. Williams, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 20;35(27):3097-3104. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.9987. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
Purpose Adjuvant therapy for intermediate-risk and high-risk localized prostate cancer decreases the number of deaths from this disease. Surrogates for overall survival (OS) could expedite the evaluation of new adjuvant therapies. Methods By June 2013, 102 completed or ongoing randomized trials were identified and individual patient data were collected from 28 trials with 28,905 patients. Disease-free survival (DFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were determined for 21,140 patients from 24 trials and 12,712 patients from 19 trials, respectively. We evaluated the surrogacy of DFS and MFS for OS by using a two-stage meta-analytic validation model by determining the correlation of an intermediate clinical end point with OS and the correlation of treatment effects on both the intermediate clinical end point and OS. Results Trials enrolled patients from 1987 to 2011. After a median follow-up of 10 years, 45% of 21,140 men and 45% of 12,712 men experienced a DFS and MFS event, respectively. For DFS and MFS, 61% and 90% of the patients, respectively, were from radiation trials, and 63% and 66%, respectively, had high-risk disease. At the patient level, Kendall's τ correlation with OS was 0.85 and 0.91 for DFS and MFS, respectively. At the trial level, R was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.90) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.88) from weighted linear regression of 8-year OS rates versus 5-year DFS and MFS rates, respectively. Treatment effects-measured by log hazard ratios-for the surrogates and OS were well correlated ( R, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.82] for DFS and 0.92 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.95] for MFS). Conclusion MFS is a strong surrogate for OS for localized prostate cancer that is associated with a significant risk of death from prostate cancer.
目的 对中危和高危局限性前列腺癌进行辅助治疗可降低该病的死亡人数。总生存(OS)替代指标可加快对新辅助治疗的评估。方法 截至2013年6月,确定了102项已完成或正在进行的随机试验,并从28项试验中的28905例患者收集了个体患者数据。分别从24项试验中的21140例患者和19项试验中的12712例患者确定了无病生存(DFS)和无转移生存(MFS)情况。我们通过使用两阶段Meta分析验证模型,通过确定中间临床终点与OS的相关性以及治疗对中间临床终点和OS的影响的相关性,评估DFS和MFS对OS的替代作用。结果 试验纳入了1987年至2011年的患者。中位随访10年后,21140例男性中的45%和12712例男性中的45%分别经历了DFS和MFS事件。对于DFS和MFS,分别有61%和90%的患者来自放疗试验,分别有63%和66%的患者患有高危疾病。在患者层面,DFS和MFS与OS的Kendall's τ相关性分别为0.85和0.91。在试验层面,通过对8年OS率与5年DFS和MFS率进行加权线性回归,R分别为0.86(95%CI,0.78至0.90)和0.83(95%CI,0.71至0.88)。替代指标和OS的治疗效果(以对数风险比衡量)相关性良好(DFS的R为0.73[95%CI,0.53至0.82],MFS的R为0.92[95%CI,0.81至0.95])。结论 MFS是局限性前列腺癌OS的有力替代指标,与前列腺癌死亡的显著风险相关。