• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在辛奇 III 型憩室炎的治疗中,腹腔镜腹膜灌洗失败是否可预测?

Is the Failure of Laparoscopic Peritoneal Lavage Predictable in Hinchey III Diverticulitis Management?

作者信息

Greilsamer Tristan, Abet Emeric, Meurette Guillaume, Comy Michel, Hamy Antoine, Lehur Paul-Antoine, Venara Aurélien, Duchalais Emilie

机构信息

1 Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France 2 Department of Digestive Surgery, Vendée Medical Center, La-Roche-Sur-Yon, France 3 Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Sep;60(9):965-970. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000891.

DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000891
PMID:28796735
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage is an alternative to sigmoid resection in Hinchey III diverticulitis (generalized purulent peritonitis). The main limitation of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage is the higher rate of reoperation for persistent sepsis in comparison with sigmoid resection.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the current study was to identify risk factors for laparoscopic peritoneal lavage failure in patients who have Hinchey III diverticulitis.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective multicenter study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted in 3 clinical sites in France.

PATIENTS

From 2006 to 2015, all consecutive patients undergoing emergent surgery for diverticulitis were reviewed. All patients operated on with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for laparoscopically confirmed Hinchey III diverticulitis were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome was laparoscopic peritoneal lavage failure, defined as reoperation or death at 30 postoperative days.

RESULTS

A series of 71 patients (43 men, mean age 58 ± 15 years) were operated on with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for Hinchey III diverticulitis. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage failed in 14 (20%) of them: 1 died and 13 underwent reoperations. No major complication (Dindo-Clavien score ≥3) occurred after reoperation. Immunosuppressive drugs (p = 0.01) and ASA grade ≥3 (p = 0.02) were associated with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage failure after univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified only immunosuppressive drug intake (steroids or chemotherapy for cancer) as an independent predictive factor. Mean length of stay was 14.9 days (5-67). At the end of the 30 first postoperative days, 12 (17%) patients had a stoma.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its retrospective nature and the small size of the cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight immunosuppressive drug intake as a major risk factor for laparoscopic peritoneal lavage failure in patients who have Hinchey III diverticulitis. Immunosuppression and severe comorbidities (ASA ≥3) should be considered when selecting a surgical option in patients with Hinchey III diverticulitis. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A423.

摘要

背景

在欣奇 III 型憩室炎(弥漫性化脓性腹膜炎)中,腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗是乙状结肠切除术的一种替代方法。与乙状结肠切除术相比,腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗的主要局限性在于持续性脓毒症的再次手术率较高。

目的

本研究的目的是确定患有欣奇 III 型憩室炎的患者腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗失败的危险因素。

设计

这是一项回顾性多中心研究。

地点

该研究在法国的 3 个临床地点进行。

患者

对 2006 年至 2015 年期间所有因憩室炎接受急诊手术的连续患者进行了回顾。纳入所有因腹腔镜确诊的欣奇 III 型憩室炎而接受腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗手术的患者。

主要观察指标

主要结局是腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗失败,定义为术后 30 天内再次手术或死亡。

结果

一组 71 例患者(43 名男性,平均年龄 58±15 岁)因欣奇 III 型憩室炎接受了腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗手术。其中 14 例(20%)腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗失败:1 例死亡,13 例接受了再次手术。再次手术后未发生重大并发症(Dindo-Clavien 评分≥3)。单因素分析显示,免疫抑制药物(p = 0.01)和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级≥3(p = 0.02)与腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗失败相关。多因素分析仅确定免疫抑制药物摄入(类固醇或癌症化疗)为独立预测因素。平均住院时间为 14.9 天(5 - 67 天)。术后 30 天结束时,12 例(17%)患者有造口。

局限性

该研究受其回顾性性质和队列规模较小的限制。

结论

我们的结果突出了免疫抑制药物摄入是患有欣奇 III 型憩室炎患者腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗失败的主要危险因素。在为欣奇 III 型憩室炎患者选择手术方案时,应考虑免疫抑制和严重合并症(ASA≥3)。见视频摘要:http://links.lww.com/DCR/A423 。

相似文献

1
Is the Failure of Laparoscopic Peritoneal Lavage Predictable in Hinchey III Diverticulitis Management?在辛奇 III 型憩室炎的治疗中,腹腔镜腹膜灌洗失败是否可预测?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Sep;60(9):965-970. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000891.
2
Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for Hinchey III diverticulitis: is it as effective as it is applicable?腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗治疗欣奇 III 级憩室炎:其适用性与有效性是否相当?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Dec;57(12):1384-90. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000252.
3
Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage versus laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in complicated acute diverticulitis: a multicenter prospective observational study.腹腔镜腹腔灌洗与腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗复杂性急性憩室炎的比较:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Dec;34(12):2111-2120. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03429-5. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
Laparoscopic lavage versus surgical resection for acute diverticulitis with generalised peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜灌洗术与手术切除治疗伴有弥漫性腹膜炎的急性憩室炎:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Feb;21(2):93-110. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1585-0. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
5
Multicentre international trial of laparoscopic lavage for Hinchey III acute diverticulitis (LLO Study).多中心国际腹腔镜灌洗治疗希氏 III 级急性憩室炎(LLO 研究)。
Br J Surg. 2018 Dec;105(13):1835-1843. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10916. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
6
Is laparoscopic lavage safe in purulent diverticulitis versus colonic resection? A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜灌洗治疗脓性憩室炎与结肠切除术相比是否安全?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Nov;71:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
7
Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: The SCANDIV Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜灌洗与一期切除术治疗急性穿孔性憩室炎:SCANDIV 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1364-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12076.
8
Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated colonic diverticulitis: a definitive treatment? Retrospective analysis of 63 cases.腹腔镜腹腔灌洗治疗穿孔性结肠憩室炎:确定性治疗?63 例回顾性分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Feb;19(2):105-10. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1258-1. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
9
Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma for Hinchey 3 complicated diverticulitis: results of a comparative study.腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗术或带失功造口的一期吻合术治疗 Hinchey 3 级复杂性憩室炎:一项对比研究的结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Apr;52(4):609-15. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a0a674.
10
One-year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage versus primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis.SCANDIV 随机临床试验中腹腔镜灌洗与原发性切除术治疗急性穿孔性憩室炎的 1 年结果。
Br J Surg. 2017 Sep;104(10):1382-1392. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10567. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: is it more valuable than CRP in assessing severity of acute diverticulitis at initial presentation? A single-center retrospective cohort study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值:在评估急性憩室炎初诊时的严重程度方面,它是否比C反应蛋白更具价值?一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03983-8.
2
Laparoscopic lavage for Hinchey III perforated diverticulitis: factors for treatment failure in two randomized clinical trials.腹腔镜冲洗治疗 Hinchey III 期穿孔性憩室炎:两项随机临床试验中治疗失败的因素。
Br J Surg. 2023 Jun 12;110(7):846-851. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad114.
3
Management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis. A multidisciplinary review and position paper.
穿孔性憩室炎伴弥漫性腹膜炎的处理。多学科回顾和立场文件。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Feb;25(2):153-165. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02346-y. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
4
Long-term follow-up of a multicentre cohort study on laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis.腹腔镜腹腔灌洗治疗穿孔性憩室炎的多中心队列研究的长期随访。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jun;21(6):705-714. doi: 10.1111/codi.14586. Epub 2019 Mar 7.