Karoui Mehdi, Champault Axèle, Pautrat Karine, Valleur Patrice, Cherqui Daniel, Champault Gérard
AP-HP, Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Apr;52(4):609-15. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a0a674.
This study was designed to compare postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and open primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma in the management of Hinchey 3 diverticulitis.
From 1994 to 2006, 35 patients underwent laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for Hinchey 3 diverticulitis in three institutions. Data prospectively collected were compared with those of a retrospective series of 24 patients matched for Hinchey's classification and who underwent primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma.
There was no postoperative death. Postoperative morbidity was not different between the two groups. One patient in the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage group required a Hartmann's procedure because of a colonic fistula. One patient in the primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma group underwent a reoperation for incisional dehiscence. The median hospital stay was lower in patients treated by laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (8 vs. 17 days, P < 0.0001). Twenty-five patients in the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage group underwent elective laparoscopic resection. One of them required conversion to laparotomy. All patients in the primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma group have had their ileostomy closed. Cumulative surgical morbidity (16 vs. 37.5 percent, P = 0.0507) and hospital stay (14 vs. 23 days, P < 0.0001) were lower in the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage group.
In the management of Hinchey 3 diverticulitis, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage does not result in excess morbidity or mortality, it reduces the length of hospital stay and avoids a stoma in most patients, and it is, therefore, a reasonable alternative to primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma.
本研究旨在比较腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗术与开放手术一期吻合加造口减压术治疗欣奇3级憩室炎的术后效果。
1994年至2006年期间,三家机构的35例患者因欣奇3级憩室炎接受了腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗术。将前瞻性收集的数据与回顾性系列研究中24例因欣奇分级匹配且接受一期吻合加造口减压术的患者的数据进行比较。
术后无死亡病例。两组术后发病率无差异。腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗组有1例患者因结肠瘘需要行哈特曼手术。一期吻合加造口减压术组有1例患者因切口裂开再次手术。腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗术治疗的患者中位住院时间较短(8天对17天,P < 0.0001)。腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗组有25例患者接受了择期腹腔镜切除术。其中1例需要转为开腹手术。一期吻合加造口减压术组的所有患者均已关闭回肠造口。腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗组的累积手术发病率(16%对37.5%,P = 0.0507)和住院时间(14天对23天,P < 0.0001)较低。
在欣奇3级憩室炎的治疗中,腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗术不会导致额外的发病率或死亡率,它缩短了住院时间,且在大多数患者中避免了造口,因此,是一期吻合加造口减压术的合理替代方案。