Suppr超能文献

老年钝性胸部创伤患者不良结局的危险因素:系统评价。

Risk factors for adverse outcomes in older adults with blunt chest trauma: A systematic review.

机构信息

*College of Medicine,Department of Emergency Medicine,University of Saskatchewan,Saskatoon,SK.

‡Trauma Nova Scotia,Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness,Halifax,NS.

出版信息

CJEM. 2018 Jul;20(4):614-622. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.377. Epub 2017 Aug 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to systematically review the published literature for risk factors associated with adverse outcomes in older adults sustaining blunt chest trauma.

METHODS

EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched from inception until March 2017 for prognostic factors associated with adverse outcomes in older adults sustaining blunt chest trauma using a pre-specified search strategy. References were independently screened for inclusion by two reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Where appropriate, descriptive statistics were used to evaluate study characteristics and predictors of adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirteen cohort studies representing 79,313 patients satisfied our selection criteria. Overall, 26 prognostic factors were examined across studies and were reported for morbidity (8 studies), length of stay (7 studies), mortality (6 studies), and loss of independence (1 study). No studies examined patient quality of life or emergency department recidivism. Prognostic factors associated with morbidity and mortality included age, number of rib fractures, and injury severity score. Although age and rib fractures were found to be associated with adverse outcomes in more than 3 studies, meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity amongst included studies in how these variables were measured.

CONCLUSIONS

While blunt chest wall trauma in older adults is relatively common, the literature on prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in this patient population remains inadequate due to a paucity of high quality studies and lack of consistent reporting standards.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在系统回顾已发表的文献,以确定与老年钝性胸部创伤不良结局相关的危险因素。

方法

从建库至 2017 年 3 月,我们使用预先设定的检索策略,在 EMBASE 和 MEDLINE 中检索与老年钝性胸部创伤不良结局相关的预后因素。两名评审员独立筛选纳入的参考文献。使用预后研究质量工具评估研究质量。在适当的情况下,使用描述性统计来评估研究特征和不良结局的预测因素。

结果

符合选择标准的 13 项队列研究共纳入 79313 例患者。总体而言,26 个预后因素在研究中得到了检查,并报告了发病率(8 项研究)、住院时间(7 项研究)、死亡率(6 项研究)和丧失独立性(1 项研究)。没有研究检查患者的生活质量或急诊科复发率。与发病率和死亡率相关的预后因素包括年龄、肋骨骨折数量和损伤严重程度评分。尽管年龄和肋骨骨折在超过 3 项研究中与不良结局相关,但由于纳入研究在如何测量这些变量方面存在异质性,因此未进行荟萃分析。

结论

虽然老年钝性胸壁创伤较为常见,但由于高质量研究不足且缺乏一致的报告标准,该患者人群不良结局的预后因素相关文献仍不充分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验