Raymond Marie-Hélène, Demers Louise, Feldman Debbie Ehrmann
School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Research Center, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Greater Montreal Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Research Center, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):35-42.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.031. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
To compare the preferences of occupational therapists, elderly people, and adults with disabilities regarding prioritization criteria for occupational therapy waiting lists in home care.
Discrete choice experiment survey.
Survey mailed to occupational therapists working in home care and community-dwelling elderly or disabled persons.
A sample (N=714) of home-based occupational therapists (n=241), elderly persons from a bank of research participants (n=226), and adults with physical disabilities recruited through community organizations (n=247).
Not applicable.
The dependent variable was whether the referral scenario was prioritized or not in each question. The results were analyzed through logistic regression using conditional logit models.
Prioritization preferences differed between groups (P<.001). Occupational therapists most strongly prioritized people who had a few falls (odds ratio vs no falls, 48.7), whereas elderly people and adults with disabilities most strongly prioritized people who were unable to enter and exit the home (odds ratio vs no difficulty entering and exiting the home, 30.8 for elderly people and 16.8 for persons with disabilities.) CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the gap between the priorities of home-based occupational therapists and their target clientele. Although further inquiry is needed to inform priority setting, the findings emphasize the importance of public or patient involvement in decisions on waiting list prioritization.
比较职业治疗师、老年人和残疾成年人在家庭护理中职业治疗候诊名单优先排序标准方面的偏好。
离散选择实验调查。
向从事家庭护理工作的职业治疗师以及居家的老年人或残疾人邮寄调查问卷。
样本(N = 714)包括居家职业治疗师(n = 241)、来自研究参与者库的老年人(n = 226)以及通过社区组织招募的身体残疾成年人(n = 247)。
不适用。
每个问题中的因变量是转诊情况是否被优先考虑。结果通过使用条件logit模型的逻辑回归进行分析。
不同组之间的优先排序偏好存在差异(P <.001)。职业治疗师最强烈地将跌倒次数少的人列为优先(与未跌倒者相比,优势比为48.7),而老年人和残疾成年人最强烈地将无法进出家门的人列为优先(与进出家门无障碍者相比,老年人的优势比为30.8,残疾人的优势比为16.8)。结论:我们的结果凸显了居家职业治疗师的优先事项与其目标客户群体之间的差距。尽管需要进一步探究以指导优先事项的设定,但研究结果强调了公众或患者参与候诊名单优先排序决策的重要性。