Suppr超能文献

欧洲的家庭废物管理环境绩效-7 个国家的例子。

Environmental performance of household waste management in Europe - An example of 7 countries.

机构信息

Technical University of Denmark, Department of Environmental Engineering, Bygningstorvet, Building 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.

Technical University of Denmark, Department of Environmental Engineering, Bygningstorvet, Building 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2017 Nov;69:545-557. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.042. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

Abstract

An attributional life cycle assessment (LCA) of the management of 1ton of household waste was conducted in accordance with ISO 14044:2006 and the ILCD Handbook for seven European countries, namely Germany, Denmark, France, UK, Italy, Poland and Greece, representing different household waste compositions, waste management practices, technologies, and energy systems. National data were collected from a range of sources regarding household waste composition, household sorting efficiency, collection, waste treatments, recycling, electricity and heat composition, and technological efficiencies. The objective was to quantify the environmental performance in the different countries, in order to analyze the sources of the main environmental impacts and national differences which affect the results. In most of the seven countries, household waste management provides environmental benefits when considering the benefits of recycling of materials and recovering and utilization of energy. Environmental benefits come from paper recycling and, to a lesser extent, the recycling of metals and glass. Waste-to-energy plants can lead to an environmental load (as in France) or a saving (Germany and Denmark), depending mainly on the composition of the energy being substituted. Sensitivity analysis and a data quality assessment identified a range of critical parameters, suggesting from where better data should be obtained. The study concluded that household waste management is environmentally the best in European countries with a minimum reliance on landfilling, also induced by the implementation of the Waste Hierarchy, though environmental performance does not correlate clearly with the rate of material recycling. From an environmental point of view, this calls for a change in the waste management paradigm, with less focus on where the waste is routed and more of a focus on the quality and utilization of recovered materials and energy.

摘要

对七个欧洲国家(德国、丹麦、法国、英国、意大利、波兰和希腊)的 1 吨家庭废物管理进行了归因生命周期评估(LCA),该评估符合 ISO 14044:2006 和 ILCD 手册的要求,代表了不同的家庭废物成分、废物管理实践、技术和能源系统。从家庭废物成分、家庭分类效率、收集、废物处理、回收、电力和热力成分以及技术效率等方面,从各种来源收集了有关国家数据。目的是量化不同国家的环境绩效,以便分析主要环境影响的来源和影响结果的国家差异。在这七个国家中,家庭废物管理在考虑材料回收和能源回收利用的益处时,提供了环境效益。环境效益来自纸张回收,在较小程度上来自金属和玻璃的回收。垃圾焚烧厂可能会导致环境负荷(如法国)或节省(德国和丹麦),这主要取决于替代能源的组成。敏感性分析和数据质量评估确定了一系列关键参数,表明应从何处获得更好的数据。研究得出的结论是,在废物最少依赖填埋的欧洲国家,家庭废物管理在环境方面是最好的,这也是由于废物层级制度的实施,尽管环境绩效与物质回收利用率之间没有明显的相关性。从环境角度来看,这需要改变废物管理模式,减少对废物去向的关注,更多地关注回收材料和能源的质量和利用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验