Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK.
School of Health and Social Care, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Sports Spine Centre, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Physiotherapy. 2017 Dec;103(4):423-429. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
To investigate the effect of pain neurophysiology education (PNE) on student physiotherapists': (1) knowledge of chronic pain; (2) attitudes towards patients with chronic pain; and (3) clinical recommendations for patients with chronic pain.
Multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial.
One UK and one Irish university.
Seventy-two student physiotherapists.
Participants received either PNE (intervention) or a control education. Both were delivered in a 70-minute group lecture.
(1) The Revised Pain Neurophysiology Quiz to assess knowledge; (2) the Health Care Pain Attitudes and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) to assess attitudes; and (3) a case vignette to assess the appropriateness of clinical recommendations.
Post education, the PNE group had a greater increase in pain neurophysiology knowledge [mean difference 4.0 (95% confidence interval 3.2 to 4.7), P<0.01] and more improved attitudes [-17.5 (95% confidence interval -22.1 to -12.9), P<0.01] compared with the control group. Post education, students in the PNE group were more likely to make appropriate recommendations regarding work (94% vs 56%), exercise (92% vs 56%), activity (94% vs 67%) and bed rest (69% vs 33%) compared with those in the control group (P<0.05).
The improvements in knowledge, attitudes and recommendations for pain management show that PNE is a potentially valuable part of the education of physiotherapy students, and could be used on a more widespread basis. There is a need to investigate whether these findings can be replicated in other healthcare professions, and how well these reported changes lead to changes in actual clinical behaviour and the clinical outcomes of patients.
探讨疼痛神经生理学教育(PNE)对学生理疗师的影响:(1)慢性疼痛知识;(2)对慢性疼痛患者的态度;(3)慢性疼痛患者的临床建议。
多中心单盲随机对照试验。
一所英国大学和一所爱尔兰大学。
72 名学生理疗师。
参与者接受 PNE(干预)或对照教育。两者都在 70 分钟的小组讲座中进行。
(1)修订后的疼痛神经生理学测验以评估知识;(2)医疗保健疼痛态度和损伤关系量表(HC-PAIRS)评估态度;(3)案例小插图以评估临床建议的适当性。
教育后,PNE 组的疼痛神经生理学知识有较大的增加[平均差异 4.0(95%置信区间 3.2 至 4.7),P<0.01],态度也有所改善[ -17.5(95%置信区间 -22.1 至 -12.9),P<0.01],与对照组相比。教育后,PNE 组的学生在工作(94%比 56%)、运动(92%比 56%)、活动(94%比 67%)和卧床休息(69%比 33%)方面更有可能提出适当的建议与对照组相比(P<0.05)。
在知识、态度和疼痛管理建议方面的改善表明,PNE 是理疗学生教育的一个潜在有价值的组成部分,可以更广泛地使用。需要研究这些发现是否可以在其他医疗保健专业中复制,以及这些报告的变化在实际临床行为和患者的临床结果中产生的变化程度。