• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《智障人群姑息治疗中的预先医疗指示计划:系统综述》。

Advance Care Planning in Palliative Care for People With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Maasveld, Koraalgroep, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Expertise Centre for Palliative Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Dec;54(6):938-960.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.016
PMID:28797850
Abstract

CONTEXT

Advance care planning (ACP) is defined as a person-centered, ongoing process of communication that facilitates patients' understanding, reflection, and discussion of goals, values, and preferences for future care. There is evidence for the general palliative care population that ACP increases compliance with patients' end-of-life preferences and improves quality of care near the end of life.

OBJECTIVES

To gain insight into what is known about the use and effects of ACP in palliative care for people with intellectual disabilities (IDs).

METHODS

Four databases were searched systematically: PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL. A stepwise procedure was used to identify relevant studies based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. The review included empirical quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies concerning people with ID who receive palliative care or who died non-acutely, and describing ACP. Methodological quality was graded using a critical appraisal tool.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were included. Most studies examined the perspective of professionals and/or relatives. None of the studies focused on the perspective of patients with ID. The studies concerned different elements of ACP, mainly decision-making and organizational policies. No effect studies were found. Obstructing factors were difficulties in recognizing palliative needs and uncertainties among relatives and professionals about their roles and tasks in ACP. Conducive factors were good working relationships between professionals and relatives.

CONCLUSION

There are some indications that ACP could be useful for people with ID, but more knowledge is needed about whether and how ACP should be used.

摘要

背景

预先医疗指示(ACP)被定义为一个以患者为中心、持续进行的沟通过程,旨在促进患者对未来医疗的目标、价值观和偏好的理解、反思和讨论。有证据表明,对于一般的姑息治疗人群,ACP 可以提高患者对临终偏好的遵从性,并改善生命末期的护理质量。

目的

深入了解在智力障碍(ID)人群的姑息治疗中使用 ACP 及其效果的相关知识。

方法

系统地检索了四个数据库:PubMed、PsycINFO、Embase 和 CINAHL。根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目,采用逐步程序来确定相关研究。该综述包括有关接受姑息治疗或非急性死亡的 ID 患者以及描述 ACP 的实证定量、定性和混合方法研究。使用批判性评价工具对方法学质量进行了分级。

结果

共纳入了 14 项研究。大多数研究考察了专业人员和/或亲属的观点。没有一项研究关注 ID 患者的观点。这些研究涉及 ACP 的不同方面,主要是决策和组织政策。没有发现效果研究。阻碍因素包括难以识别姑息治疗的需求,以及亲属和专业人员对其在 ACP 中的角色和任务的不确定性。有利因素是专业人员和亲属之间良好的工作关系。

结论

有一些迹象表明 ACP 对 ID 患者可能有用,但需要更多关于 ACP 是否以及如何使用的知识。

相似文献

1
Advance Care Planning in Palliative Care for People With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.《智障人群姑息治疗中的预先医疗指示计划:系统综述》。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Dec;54(6):938-960.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
2
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
3
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
6
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub3.
10
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Views of People With Intellectual Disabilities About What Contributes Towards Optimal End-of-Life Care: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.智力残疾者对促成最佳临终关怀因素的看法:一项定性证据综合分析
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 May;38(3):e70067. doi: 10.1111/jar.70067.
2
Co-Designing a Toolkit of Approaches and Resources for End-of-Life Care Planning With People With Intellectual Disabilities Within Adult Social Care Settings: A Multi-Phase Study.与成人社会护理环境中的智障人士共同设计临终关怀规划方法和资源工具包:一项多阶段研究
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Jan;38(1):e70019. doi: 10.1111/jar.70019.
3
Don't assume, ask! A focus group study on end-of-life care planning with people with intellectual disabilities from minoritised ethnic groups.
不要假设,要询问!一项针对少数族裔智障人士临终关怀规划的焦点小组研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 14;24(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01646-0.
4
Autonomy & advocacy in planning for a medical emergency: Adults with a learning disability and family carers' experiences and perceptions of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) process.医疗紧急情况规划中的自主权与支持:有学习障碍的成年人及家庭护理人员对紧急护理与治疗推荐总结计划(ReSPECT)流程的体验与看法。
NIHR Open Res. 2024 Oct 10;4:8. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13555.2. eCollection 2024.
5
Challenges and opportunities for improvement when people with an intellectual disability or serious mental illness also need palliative care: A qualitative meta-ethnography.智力残疾或严重精神疾病患者也需要姑息治疗时面临的挑战和改进机会:定性元分析。
Palliat Med. 2023 Sep;37(8):1047-1062. doi: 10.1177/02692163231175928. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
6
[Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions].[复苏伦理与生命终结决策]
Notf Rett Med. 2021;24(4):720-749. doi: 10.1007/s10049-021-00888-8. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
Consensus on a conversation aid for shared decision making with people with intellectual disabilities in the palliative phase.关于在终末期有智力障碍的人群中使用沟通辅助工具来共同决策的共识。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Nov;34(6):1538-1548. doi: 10.1111/jar.12898. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
8
Interventions for improving self-direction in people with dementia: a systematic review.干预措施对改善痴呆患者自我导向能力的影响:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 20;21(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02133-w.
9
The palliative care needs of adults with intellectual disabilities and their access to palliative care services: A systematic review.智力残疾成年人的姑息治疗需求及其获得姑息治疗服务的途径:系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;34(8):1006-1018. doi: 10.1177/0269216320932774. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
10
Availability and effectiveness of decision aids for supporting shared decision making in patients with advanced colorectal and lung cancer: Results from a systematic review.支持晚期结直肠癌和肺癌患者共同决策的决策辅助工具的可及性和有效性:系统评价的结果。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13079. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13079. Epub 2019 May 8.