Suppr超能文献

蒙古草原的草地生产力与碳固存:潜在机制及游牧影响

Grassland productivity and carbon sequestration in Mongolian grasslands: The underlying mechanisms and nomadic implications.

作者信息

Shao Changliang, Chen Jiquan, Chu Housen, Lafortezza Raffaele, Dong Gang, Abraha Michael, Batkhishig Ochirbat, John Ranjeet, Ouyang Zutao, Zhang Yaoqi, Qi Jiaguo

机构信息

Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.

Center for Global Change & Earth Observations (CGCEO), Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA.

出版信息

Environ Res. 2017 Nov;159:124-134. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quantifying carbon (C) dioxide exchanges between ecosystems and the atmosphere and the underlying mechanism of biophysical regulations under similar environmental conditions is critical for an accurate understanding of C budgets and ecosystem functions.

METHODS

For the first time, a cluster of four eddy covariance towers were set up to answer how C fluxes shift among four dominant ecosystems in Mongolia - meadow steppe (MDW), typical steppe (TPL), dry typical steppe (DRT) and shrubland (SHB) during two growing seasons (2014 and 2015).

RESULTS

Large variations were observed for the annual net ecosystem exchange (NEE) from 59 to 193gCm, though all four sites acted as a C source. During the two growing seasons, MDW acted as a C sink, TPL and DRT were C neutral, while SHB acted as a C source. MDW to SHB and TPL conversions resulted in a 2.6- and 2.2-fold increase in C release, respectively, whereas the TPL to SHB conversion resulted in a 1.1-fold increase at the annual scale. C assimilation was higher at MDW than those at the other three ecosystems due to its greater C assimilation ability and longer C assimilation times during the day and growing period. On the other hand, C release was highest at SHB due to significantly lower photosynthetic production and relatively higher ecosystem respiration (ER). A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the seasonal variations in NEE, ER and gross ecosystem production (GEP) were controlled by air temperature at MDW, while they were controlled mainly by soil moisture at TPL, DRT and SHB. When air temperature increased, the NEE at MDW and TPL changed more dramatically than at DRT and SHB, suggesting not only a stronger C release ability but also a higher temperature sensitivity at MDW and TPL.

CONCLUSIONS

The ongoing and predicted global changes in Mongolia likely impact the C exchange at MDW and TPL more than at DRT and SHB in Mongolia. Our results suggest that, with increasing drought and vegetation type succession, a clear trend for greater CO emissions may result in further global warming in the future. This study implies that diverse grassland ecosystems will respond differently to climate change in the future and can be seen as nature-based solutions (NBS) supporting climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies.

摘要

背景

量化生态系统与大气之间的二氧化碳交换以及相似环境条件下生物物理调节的潜在机制,对于准确理解碳收支和生态系统功能至关重要。

方法

首次设置了一组四个涡度相关塔,以回答在两个生长季节(2014年和2015年)中,蒙古的四个主要生态系统——草甸草原(MDW)、典型草原(TPL)、干旱典型草原(DRT)和灌丛(SHB)之间的碳通量如何变化。

结果

尽管所有四个站点均为碳源,但年净生态系统交换量(NEE)在59至193克碳/平方米之间存在很大差异。在两个生长季节中,MDW是碳汇,TPL和DRT是碳中性的,而SHB是碳源。从MDW转换为SHB和TPL分别导致碳释放增加2.6倍和2.2倍,而在年尺度上,从TPL转换为SHB导致碳释放增加1.1倍。由于MDW在白天和生长季节具有更强的碳同化能力和更长的碳同化时间,其碳同化量高于其他三个生态系统。另一方面,由于光合产量显著降低且生态系统呼吸(ER)相对较高,SHB的碳释放量最高。逐步多元回归分析表明,MDW的NEE、ER和总生态系统生产力(GEP)的季节变化受气温控制,而TPL、DRT和SHB的这些变化主要受土壤湿度控制。当气温升高时,MDW和TPL的NEE变化比DRT和SHB更显著,这表明MDW和TPL不仅具有更强的碳释放能力,而且对温度更敏感。

结论

蒙古当前和预测的全球变化可能对MDW和TPL的碳交换影响比对蒙古的DRT和SHB更大。我们的结果表明,随着干旱加剧和植被类型演替,未来二氧化碳排放量增加的明显趋势可能导致进一步的全球变暖。这项研究表明,不同的草原生态系统未来对气候变化的反应将有所不同,可被视为支持气候变化适应和缓解战略的基于自然的解决方案(NBS)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验