Wu Wei, Chen Jingdi, Ding Qianshan, Yang Dongmei, Yu Honggang, Lin Jun
Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;28(5):329-336. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2017.16573. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection has been widely accepted. At present, the number of antiplatelet (APT) users has been growing. Moreover, because of high risks of thromboembolism, some patients need to continuously receive APT agents. The relationship between hemorrhage and continuous therapy with low-dose aspirin (LDA) remains controversial.
A systematic search was conducted; studies were screened out- if data of no-anticoagulant/APT drugs use and interrupted and continued-LDA use were reported separately. The Newcastle-scale was chosen to assess the quality of the included studies. Review Manager 5.2 was used for quality assessment statistical analysis, and the odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
Pooled data suggested a significantly higher bleeding ratio in the LDA-continued group compared to both the LDA-interrupted group (OR=2.05, 95% CI=1.05-3.99) and no-anticoagulant/APT group (OR=2.89, 95% CI=1.86-4.47). However, the LDA-interrupted group did not differ significantly from the no-anticoagulant/APT group. The en bloc resection rates of the LDA-continued group versus the LDA-interrupted group, the LDA-continued group versus no-anticoagulant/APT group, and the LDA-interrupted group versus the no-anticoagulant/APT group were similar (OR=0.82, 95% CI=0.21-3.24, p=0.78; OR=0.80, 95% CI=0.24-2.65, p=0.71; OR=1.41, 95% CI=0.38-5.24, p=0.60, respectively).
There is an extremely high ratio of bleeding in the LDA-continued group compared to both the LDA-interrupted group and no-anticoagulant/APT group. All groups had similar ratios of en bloc resection.
背景/目的:内镜黏膜下剥离术已被广泛接受。目前,抗血小板药物(APT)使用者的数量一直在增加。此外,由于血栓栓塞风险高,一些患者需要持续接受APT药物治疗。出血与低剂量阿司匹林(LDA)持续治疗之间的关系仍存在争议。
进行系统检索;如果分别报告了未使用抗凝/APT药物以及中断和持续使用LDA的数据,则将研究筛选出来。选择纽卡斯尔量表来评估纳入研究的质量。使用Review Manager 5.2进行质量评估统计分析,并计算比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
汇总数据表明,与LDA中断组(OR=2.05,95%CI=1.05-3.99)和未使用抗凝/APT组(OR=2.89,95%CI=1.86-4.47)相比,LDA持续组的出血率显著更高。然而,LDA中断组与未使用抗凝/APT组之间无显著差异。LDA持续组与LDA中断组、LDA持续组与未使用抗凝/APT组、LDA中断组与未使用抗凝/APT组的整块切除率相似(OR分别为0.82,95%CI=0.21-3.