D'Cruz L
Woodford Dental Care, General Practice, 120 Lambourne Road, Chigwell, Essex, IG7 6EF.
Br Dent J. 2017 Aug 11;223(3):199-201. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.666.
Over the years there have been many conceptual changes in how dental disease is prevented and managed. What is now the norm and standard practice was at some earlier time considered to be at best pioneering, and at its worst, heresy or negligent. When we look, for example at how we conservatively manage periodontal disease when less than a generation ago we were wielding surgical knives far more frequently than we do now, we can see how research and evidence-based dentistry has influenced our thinking. We are very much at that tipping point now with minimum intervention (MI) dentistry. This article will discuss the impact of MI dentistry from a legal viewpoint, covering such aspects as consent and record-keeping.
多年来,在预防和管理牙病的方式上发生了许多观念上的变化。现在被视为常态和标准做法的事情,在早些时候充其量被认为是开创性的,而在最糟糕的情况下,则被视为异端邪说或疏忽行为。例如,当我们审视如今如何保守地治疗牙周病时,不到一代人以前,我们使用手术刀的频率比现在高得多,从中可以看出研究和循证牙科如何影响了我们的思维。现在,我们在最小干预(MI)牙科方面正处于那个转折点。本文将从法律角度探讨最小干预牙科的影响,涵盖同意和记录保存等方面。