• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增加干扰何时有助于学习:干扰项的数量和内容对记忆的影响存在交互作用。

When increasing distraction helps learning: Distractor number and content interact in their effects on memory.

作者信息

Nussenbaum Kate, Amso Dima, Markant Julie

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, UK, OX1 3PH.

Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2606-2619. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1399-1.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-017-1399-1
PMID:28799028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5662706/
Abstract

Previous work has demonstrated that increasing the number of distractors in a search array can reduce interference from distractor content during target processing. However, it is unclear how this reduced interference influences learning of target information. Here, we investigated how varying the amount and content of distraction present in a learning environment affects visual search and subsequent memory for target items. In two experiments, we demonstrate that the number and content of competing distractors interact in their influence on target selection and memory. Specifically, while increasing the number of distractors present in a search array made target detection more effortful, it did not impair learning and memory for target content. Instead, when the distractors contained category information that conflicted with the target, increasing the number of distractors from one to three actually benefitted learning and memory. These data suggest that increasing numbers of distractors may reduce interference from conflicting conceptual information during encoding.

摘要

先前的研究表明,增加搜索阵列中干扰项的数量可以减少目标处理过程中干扰项内容的干扰。然而,尚不清楚这种减少的干扰如何影响目标信息的学习。在这里,我们研究了学习环境中干扰的数量和内容的变化如何影响对目标项目的视觉搜索和后续记忆。在两个实验中,我们证明了竞争性干扰项的数量和内容在对目标选择和记忆的影响上存在相互作用。具体而言,虽然增加搜索阵列中干扰项的数量会使目标检测更加费力,但它不会损害对目标内容的学习和记忆。相反,当干扰项包含与目标冲突的类别信息时,将干扰项的数量从一个增加到三个实际上有利于学习和记忆。这些数据表明,增加干扰项的数量可能会减少编码过程中来自冲突概念信息的干扰。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/15d554d08a6e/13414_2017_1399_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/71a28fee1cd6/13414_2017_1399_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/e2bc9996f9cf/13414_2017_1399_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/a7a872618d99/13414_2017_1399_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/05fb0fa72b6f/13414_2017_1399_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/27397298b3d0/13414_2017_1399_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/15d554d08a6e/13414_2017_1399_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/71a28fee1cd6/13414_2017_1399_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/e2bc9996f9cf/13414_2017_1399_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/a7a872618d99/13414_2017_1399_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/05fb0fa72b6f/13414_2017_1399_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/27397298b3d0/13414_2017_1399_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e280/5662706/15d554d08a6e/13414_2017_1399_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
When increasing distraction helps learning: Distractor number and content interact in their effects on memory.增加干扰何时有助于学习:干扰项的数量和内容对记忆的影响存在交互作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2606-2619. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1399-1.
2
The formation of source memory under distraction.分心状态下源记忆的形成。
Behav Brain Funct. 2014 Oct 24;10:40. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-10-40.
3
Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.被记住但未被使用:工作记忆中不引导注意力的附属项目。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jun;21(6):1081-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21083.
4
Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.选择性注意通过调节对干扰物的知觉加工来支持工作记忆的维持。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jan;19(1):32-41. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.32.
5
Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.在聚焦注意力任务中,干扰项干扰并非由注意力捕获介导。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Sep;62(9):1685-95. doi: 10.1080/17470210902811223. Epub 2009 Apr 11.
6
Inhibiting change: effects of memory on auditory selective attention.抑制变化:记忆对听觉选择性注意的影响。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Oct;25(2):431-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.07.002. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
7
Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.在多个目标类别中进行搜索揭示了视觉工作记忆的灵活性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.获得奖励的视觉项目仅在异质环境中吸引注意力。
Psychophysiology. 2016 Jul;53(7):1063-73. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12641. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
9
Distractor-relevance determines whether task-switching enhances or impairs distractor memory.干扰项相关性决定了任务切换是增强还是损害干扰项记忆。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jan;42(1):1-5. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000181. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
10
Task-irrelevant distractors in the delay period interfere selectively with visual short-term memory for spatial locations.延迟期内与任务无关的干扰物会选择性地干扰对空间位置的视觉短期记忆。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul;79(5):1384-1392. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1320-y.

引用本文的文献

1
From focus to function: Longitudinal insights into infant attention and emerging executive functions via remote webcam eye tracking.从注意力到功能:通过远程网络摄像头眼动追踪对婴儿注意力和新兴执行功能的纵向洞察。
Dev Psychol. 2025 May;61(5):957-963. doi: 10.1037/dev0001948. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
2
Toward Efficiency and Effectiveness: Comparing Equivalence-based Instruction to Progressive Discrete Trial Teaching.迈向高效与成效:基于等价性教学与渐进式离散试验教学的比较
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Mar 31;15(4):1296-1313. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00687-8. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
The Relation between Sustained Attention and Incidental and Intentional Object-Location Memory.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing recognition memory using confidence ratings and response times.使用信心评级和反应时间评估再认记忆。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Apr 13;3(4):150670. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150670. eCollection 2016 Apr.
2
Biased Competition during Long-term Memory Formation.长期记忆形成过程中的偏向竞争
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan;28(1):187-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00889. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
3
Predicting and Improving Recognition Memory Using Multiple Electrophysiological Signals in Real Time.利用多种电生理信号实时预测和改善识别记忆
持续注意力与附带性和意向性物体位置记忆之间的关系
Brain Sci. 2020 Mar 4;10(3):145. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10030145.
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;26(7):1026-37. doi: 10.1177/0956797615578122. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
4
Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time.影响简单反应时潜伏期的因素。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 26;9:131. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131. eCollection 2015.
5
Congruency effects on recognition memory: a context effect.一致性对识别记忆的影响:一种情境效应。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2015 Jun;69(2):206-12. doi: 10.1037/cep0000049. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
6
Not all attention orienting is created equal: recognition memory is enhanced when attention orienting involves distractor suppression.并非所有的注意力定向都是一样的:当注意力定向涉及干扰抑制时,识别记忆会得到增强。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015 Apr;120:28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
7
Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity.视觉工作记忆容量个体差异背后的可分离机制。
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 1;99:197-206. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.060. Epub 2014 May 27.
8
Selective attention and recognition: effects of congruency on episodic learning.选择性注意与识别:一致性对情景学习的影响。
Psychol Res. 2015 May;79(3):411-24. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0572-6. Epub 2014 May 24.
9
Suppression of salient objects prevents distraction in visual search.显著物体的抑制可防止视觉搜索中的分心。
J Neurosci. 2014 Apr 16;34(16):5658-66. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4161-13.2014.
10
Neural conflict-control mechanisms improve memory for target stimuli.神经冲突控制机制可改善对目标刺激的记忆。
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Mar;25(3):833-43. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht283. Epub 2013 Oct 9.