Suppr超能文献

在临床试验之外接受基于达雷妥尤单抗的治疗的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的疗效。

Efficacy of daratumumab-based therapies in patients with relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma treated outside of clinical trials.

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Am J Hematol. 2017 Nov;92(11):1146-1155. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24883. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

Abstract

Outside of clinical trials, experience with daratumumab-based combination therapies (DCTs) using bortezomib (V)/lenalidomide (R)/pomalidomide (P), and dexamethasone (d) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is limited. We reviewed the outcomes of 126 patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of any DCT. Median age at DCT initiation was 67 (range, 43-93) years. High-risk cytogenetics was present in 33% patients. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1-14) and time to first DCT from diagnosis was 4.3 years (range, 0.4-13.0). Seventeen (13%) patients were refractory to single agent daratumumab. Fifty-two (41%), 34 (27%), 23 (18%), and 17 (14%) received DPd, DRd, DVd and "other" DCTs, respectively. Overall response rate was 47%. Median follow-up was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2-6.1). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2-7.8). Median overall survival was not reached (NR) with any regimen. Median PFS (months) was worst for penta-refractory MM (n = 8) vs quadruple refractory MM (n = 18) and others (n = 100) (2.2 [95% CI, 1-2.4] vs 3.1 [95% CI, 2.1-NR] vs 5.9 [95% CI, 5.0-NR]; P < .001); those who were refractory to ≥1 agents used in the DCT vs others (4.9 [95% CI, 3.1-6.0] vs 8.2 [95% CI, 4.6-NR]; P = .02); and those who received >2 prior therapies vs others (5.0 months [95% CI, 3.7-5.9] vs NR [95% CI, NR-NR]; P = .002). Non-hematologic toxicities included infections (38%), fatigue (32%), and infusion reactions (18%). Grade 3 or higher hematological toxicities were seen in 41% of patients. DCTs are effective in RRMM. ORR and PFS in heavily pretreated patients are lower than those reported in clinical trials.

摘要

在临床试验之外,使用硼替佐米(V)/来那度胺(R)/泊马度胺(P)和地塞米松(d)的达雷妥尤单抗联合治疗方案(DCT)在复发性/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)中的应用经验有限。我们回顾了 126 名接受了≥1 个周期任何 DCT 治疗的患者的结局。DCT 开始时的中位年龄为 67 岁(范围,43-93 岁)。33%的患者存在高危细胞遗传学异常。中位既往治疗线数为 4(范围,1-14),从诊断到首次接受 DCT 的时间为 4.3 年(范围,0.4-13.0)。17 名(13%)患者对单药达雷妥尤单抗耐药。52 名(41%)、34 名(27%)、23 名(18%)和 17 名(14%)分别接受 DPd、DRd、DVd 和“其他”DCT。总缓解率为 47%。中位随访时间为 5.5 个月(95%CI,4.2-6.1)。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 5.5 个月(95%CI,4.2-7.8)。任何方案的中位总生存期均未达到(NR)。五药耐药 MM(n=8)的中位 PFS(月)最差,四药耐药 MM(n=18)和其他(n=100)(2.2 [95%CI,1-2.4] vs 3.1 [95%CI,2.1-NR] vs 5.9 [95%CI,5.0-NR];P<0.001);与其他患者相比,对 DCT 中使用的≥1 种药物耐药的患者(4.9 [95%CI,3.1-6.0] vs 8.2 [95%CI,4.6-NR];P=0.02)和接受>2 线既往治疗的患者(5.0 个月[95%CI,3.7-5.9] vs NR[95%CI,NR-NR];P=0.002)。非血液学毒性包括感染(38%)、疲劳(32%)和输注反应(18%)。41%的患者出现 3 级或以上血液学毒性。DCT 在 RRMM 中有效。在既往治疗过多的患者中,ORR 和 PFS 低于临床试验报道的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验