School of Environmental Sciences, 50 Stone Road East, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Nickel Producers Environmental Research Association Inc., 2525 Meridian Parkway, Suite 240, Durham, NC 27713, USA.
Environ Pollut. 2017 Dec;231(Pt 1):165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
The Existing Substances Regulation Risk Assessments by the European Union (EU RA) generated new toxicity data for soil organisms exposed to Ni added to sixteen field-collected soils with low background concentration of metals and varying physico-chemical soil characteristics. Using only effective cation exchange capacity (eCEC) as a bioavailability correction, chronic toxicity of Ni in soils with a wide range of characteristics could be predicted within a factor of two. The objective of the present study was to determine whether this was also the case for three independent data sets of Ni toxicity thresholds. Two of the data sets were from Community Based Risk Assessments in Port Colborne ON, and Sudbury ON (Canada) for soils containing elevated concentrations of Ni, Co and Cu arising from many decades of Ni mining, smelting and refining. The third data set was the Metals in Asia study of soluble Ni added to field soils in China. These data yielded 72 leached and aged EC/NOEC values for soil Ni, for arthropods, higher plants and woodlot structure and function. These were reduced to nine most sensitive single or geometric mean species/function endpoints, none of which were lower than the HC predicted for a soil with an eCEC of 20 cmol/kg. Most of these leached and aged EC/NOEC values were from soils co-contaminated with Cu, in some cases at its median HC as predicted by the EU RA from soil characteristics. We conclude that the EU RA is protective of Ni toxicity to higher-tier ecological endpoints, including in mixture with Cu, before the assessment factor of 2 is applied. We suggest that for prospective risk assessment, the bioavailability based PNEC (HC/2) be used as a conservative screen, but for retrospective and site-specific risk assessment, the bioavailability based HC is sufficient.
欧盟现有的物质法规风险评估对添加到 16 种野外采集的土壤中,这些土壤中金属背景浓度低且具有不同理化特性的土壤生物进行了新的毒性评估。仅使用有效阳离子交换量(eCEC)作为生物有效性校正,就可以在两倍的范围内预测具有广泛特性的土壤中镍的慢性毒性。本研究的目的是确定这是否也适用于三个独立的镍毒性阈值数据集。其中两个数据集来自安大略省科尔伯恩港和萨德伯里的基于社区的风险评估,这些土壤中的镍、钴和铜浓度升高,是几十年来镍矿开采、冶炼和精炼的结果。第三个数据集是中国野外土壤中添加可溶性镍的亚洲金属研究。这些数据得出了 72 个土壤镍、节肢动物、高等植物和林地结构和功能的淋溶和老化 EC/NOEC 值。这些值被简化为 9 个最敏感的单一或几何平均种/功能终点,没有一个低于预测 eCEC 为 20 cmol/kg 的土壤的 HC。这些淋溶和老化的 EC/NOEC 值大多来自与铜共污染的土壤,在某些情况下,其 HC 与欧盟 RA 根据土壤特性预测的中位 HC 相同。我们得出结论,欧盟 RA 在应用 2 倍评估因子之前,对包括与铜混合的更高层次生态终点的镍毒性具有保护作用。我们建议,对于前瞻性风险评估,应使用基于生物有效性的 PNEC(HC/2)作为保守筛选,但对于回顾性和特定地点的风险评估,基于生物有效性的 HC 就足够了。