Suppr超能文献

与未进行或单一使用肾素-血管紧张素系统阻断治疗相比,双重肾素-血管紧张素系统阻断治疗对透析前患者肾脏替代治疗风险或死亡风险的影响:PREPARE-2研究

Effect of dual compared to no or single renin-angiotensin system blockade on risk of renal replacement therapy or death in predialysis patients: PREPARE-2 study.

作者信息

Voskamp Pauline W M, Dekker Friedo W, van Diepen Merel, Hoogeveen Ellen K

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017 Oct;11(10):635-643. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 22.

Abstract

Current guidelines on hypertension treatment in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients discourage combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) use due to the risk of an increased kidney function decline. However, dual compared to single renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade may have more efficacy with regard to hypertension and proteinuria. Among incident predialysis patients (CKD 4-5), we compared dual with no or single RAS blockade regarding kidney function decline and risk of renal replacement therapy (RRT) or death. In a multicenter cohort study, 495 incident predialysis patients (>18 years) were included between 2004 and 2011 and followed until RRT, death, or October 2016. At baseline, patients were divided into four categories: nonuser, single or dual user of ACEi and/or ARB. Cox models were used to estimate the hazard ratio for the combined end point RRT or death. Differences in decline of kidney function among the four drug groups were compared with a linear mixed model. A total of 119 patients were nonusers, 164 ACEi users, 133 ARB users, and 79 dual RAS users. Compared to nonusers, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for the combined end point was 0.75 (0.65 to 0.86) for ACEi users, 0.87 (0.76 to 1.00) for ARB users, and 0.79 (0.67 to 0.94) for dual RAS users. The average annual decline in kidney function did not differ among the four groups. We observed in predialysis patients that compared to no RAS blockade, both dual RAS blockade and single ACEi use were associated with about 20%-25% lower risk of RRT or death, without difference in kidney function decline.

摘要

目前慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者高血压治疗指南不提倡联合使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB),因为存在肾功能下降加剧的风险。然而,与单一肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)阻断相比,双重阻断在控制高血压和蛋白尿方面可能更有效。在新进入透析前阶段的患者(CKD 4-5期)中,我们比较了双重RAS阻断与不进行或单一RAS阻断在肾功能下降以及肾脏替代治疗(RRT)或死亡风险方面的差异。在一项多中心队列研究中,2004年至2011年间纳入了495例新进入透析前阶段的患者(年龄>18岁),并随访至开始RRT、死亡或2016年10月。在基线时,患者被分为四类:未使用者、ACEi和/或ARB的单一使用者或双重使用者。使用Cox模型估计RRT或死亡这一联合终点的风险比。使用线性混合模型比较四个药物组之间肾功能下降的差异。共有119例患者未使用药物,164例使用ACEi,133例使用ARB,79例使用双重RAS阻断。与未使用者相比,ACEi使用者联合终点的多变量校正风险比(95%置信区间)为0.75(0.65至0.86),ARB使用者为0.87(0.76至1.00),双重RAS阻断使用者为0.79(0.67至0.94)。四个组之间肾功能的平均年下降率没有差异。我们在透析前患者中观察到,与不进行RAS阻断相比,双重RAS阻断和单一使用ACEi均与RRT或死亡风险降低约20%-25%相关,且肾功能下降无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验