Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Oct;100(10):8398-8408. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12815. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
The relationship between biosecurity and digital dermatitis (DD) was evaluated in 8,269 cows from a convenience sample of 39 freestall dairy herds. The hypothesis was that poor implementation of biosecurity was associated with higher within-herd prevalence of DD. All lactating cows were scored as negative or positive for DD at the hind legs during milking in the milking parlor. Information about biosecurity was obtained through questionnaires addressed to farmers, on-farm observations, and information from the Danish Cattle Database (www.seges.dk). These assessment tools covered potential infection sources of DD pathogens to susceptible cows (e.g., via animals, humans, manure, vehicles, equipment, and facilities). External and internal biosecurity measures were explanatory variables in 2 separate logistic regression models, whereas within-herd DD prevalence was the outcome. Overall DD prevalence among cows and herds were 24 and 97%, respectively; the within-herd DD prevalence ranged from 0 to 56%. Poor external biosecurity measures associated with higher prevalence of DD were recent animal purchase, access to pasture, lack of boots available for visitors, farm staff working at other dairy farms as well, hoof trimming without a professional attending, and animal transporters having access to cattle area. For internal biosecurity, higher DD prevalence were associated with infrequent hoof bathing, manure scraping less than 8 times a day, manure removal direction from cows to heifers, animal pens' exit without water hoses, manure-handling vehicle used in other activities, and water troughs contaminated with manure. These findings showed that improvements on biosecurity may be beneficial for controlling DD in dairy herds. The study is relevant for farmers facing problems with DD, as well as hoof trimmers, advisors, and veterinarians, who can use the results for optimized recommendations regarding biosecurity in relation to DD. Furthermore, our results might be considered by future studies investigating DD pathogen reservoirs and transmission routes.
本研究从 39 个散栏奶牛场中抽取了 8269 头奶牛作为便利样本,评估了生物安全与奶牛数字性皮炎(digital dermatitis,DD)之间的关系。假设生物安全措施执行不力与奶牛场内 DD 流行率较高有关。所有泌乳奶牛在挤奶厅挤奶时,后腿均进行 DD 阴性或阳性评分。通过向农民发放问卷、现场观察和丹麦奶牛数据库(www.seges.dk)信息,获得生物安全相关信息。这些评估工具涵盖了 DD 病原体对易感奶牛的潜在感染源(例如,通过动物、人类、粪便、车辆、设备和设施)。外部和内部生物安全措施是 2 个独立逻辑回归模型的解释变量,而奶牛场内 DD 流行率是结果变量。奶牛和奶牛场的总体 DD 流行率分别为 24%和 97%;奶牛场内 DD 流行率范围为 0%至 56%。与 DD 高流行率相关的较差外部生物安全措施包括最近动物购买、放牧、访客无法获得靴子、农场员工也在其他奶牛场工作、蹄修剪无专业人员在场、动物运输人员可进入牛群区域。对于内部生物安全,较高的 DD 流行率与蹄浴不频繁、每天清理粪便少于 8 次、粪便从奶牛向小母牛方向清理、动物围栏出口没有水喉、粪便处理车辆用于其他活动以及水槽受到粪便污染有关。这些发现表明,提高生物安全水平可能有助于控制奶牛场内的 DD。该研究对于面临 DD 问题的农民以及蹄修剪师、顾问和兽医具有相关性,他们可以根据与 DD 相关的生物安全,利用这些结果进行优化建议。此外,我们的研究结果可能会被未来研究 DD 病原体库和传播途径的研究人员所参考。