Assistant Professor, U.P. Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidhyalaya Evam Go-Anusandhan Sansthan (DUVASU), Mathura, India.
Joint Director Extension, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, U.P, 243122, India.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024 Jul 12;56(6):203. doi: 10.1007/s11250-024-04054-3.
India's livestock sector has been facing significant losses due to episodes of disease outbreaks since time immemorial. Hence, biosecurity measures are very important to maintain and improve animal health along with prevention of disease outbreak. Keeping these facts into consideration, the study was proposed with an objective to assess the existing biosecurity practices adopted by the commercial dairy, pig and poultry farms. The current study was undertaken in the state of Uttar Pradesh as it is the leading state in milk and meat production. A total of 120 farmers were selected randomly including 40 each practicing commercial dairy, pig and poultry farming. An ex-post facto research methodology was used with face-to-face interview and observation to collect data. The biosecurity practices were assessed under seven dimensions such as, location and design of farm, restricted access, isolation and quarantine, cleaning and disinfection, management of feed and water, disposal of carcass, manure and waste, and health management. Results elicited that about 50% of the farmers had medium level of adoption who adopted 18-34 practices out of 51 practices. The average overall adoption score was 34.17 out of 51 (67%) which makes an overall adoption gap of 33%. Maximum adoption gap was seen in case of restricted access (43%) whereas minimum gap in adoption was seen in case of management of feed and water (27%). Pig and poultry farmers showed significantly higher biosecurity measures than dairy farmers (p < 0.05). The more significant contributors to the adoption of biosecurity measures were the level of knowledge of the farmers (p < 0.01). Other factors such as education, income, herd/flock size, Information and Communication Technology utilization, number of trainings also had a significant contribution (p < 0.05) in actual implementation of biosecurity. Hence, better understanding of these measures among the farmers must be ensured by hands on training along with proper demonstration of various procedures involved in maintaining farm biosecurity is need of the hour.
自古以来,印度的畜牧业一直受到疾病爆发的严重影响。因此,生物安全措施对于维护和改善动物健康以及预防疾病爆发非常重要。考虑到这些事实,本研究旨在评估商业奶牛、猪和家禽养殖场采用的现有生物安全措施。本研究在北方邦进行,因为它是牛奶和肉类生产的主要邦。总共随机选择了 120 名农民,其中商业奶牛、猪和家禽养殖各 40 名。采用事后研究方法,通过面对面访谈和观察收集数据。生物安全措施在七个方面进行评估,包括农场的位置和设计、限制进入、隔离和检疫、清洁和消毒、饲料和水的管理、尸体、粪便和废物的处理以及健康管理。结果表明,约 50%的农民采用了中等水平的生物安全措施,采用了 51 项措施中的 18-34 项。平均综合采用率为 51 项中的 34.17 分(67%),这意味着整体采用率存在 33%的差距。在限制进入方面,采用差距最大(43%),而在饲料和水的管理方面,采用差距最小(27%)。猪和家禽养殖户的生物安全措施明显高于奶牛养殖户(p<0.05)。农民的知识水平是采用生物安全措施的主要贡献者(p<0.01)。其他因素,如教育、收入、畜群/禽类规模、信息和通信技术利用、培训次数,对生物安全的实际实施也有显著贡献(p<0.05)。因此,必须通过实践培训和正确示范维护农场生物安全所涉及的各种程序,确保农民更好地理解这些措施。