Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation, La Conception University Hospital, Assistance-Publique Marseille, Marseille, France.
Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Alcalá University, Madrid, Spain.
Eur Urol. 2018 Jan;73(1):94-108. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
Renal transplantation is the gold standard renal replacement therapy in end-stage renal disease owing to its superior survival and quality of life compared with dialysis. When the potential recipient has a history of cancer, the waiting period before renal transplantation is usually based on the Cincinnati Registry.
To systematically review all available evidence on the risk of cancer recurrence in end-stage renal disease patients with a history of urological cancer.
Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to March 2017 for all relevant publications reporting oncologic outcomes of urological cancer in patients who subsequently received a transplantation or remained on dialysis. The primary outcome was time to tumour recurrence. Secondary outcomes included cancer-specific and overall survival. Data were narratively synthesised in light of methodological and clinical heterogeneity. The risk of bias of each included study was assessed.
Thirty-two retrospective studies enrolling 2519 patients (1733 dialysed, 786 renal transplantation) were included. For renal cell carcinomas, the risks of recurrence, cancer-specific, and overall survival were similar between transplantation and dialysis. For prostate cancer, most of the tumours had favourable prognoses consistent with nomograms. Studies dealing with urothelial carcinomas (UCs) mainly included upper urinary tract UC in the context of aristolochic acid nephropathy, for which the risks of synchronous bilateral tumour and recurrence were high. Data on testicular cancer were scarce.
Immunosuppression after renal transplantation does not affect the outcomes and natural history of low-risk renal cell carcinomas and prostate cancer. Therefore, the waiting time from successful treatment for these cancers to transplantation could be reduced. Except in the particular situation of aristolochic acid nephropathy, more studies are needed to standardise the waiting period after UC owing to the paucity of data.
Renal transplantation does not appear to increase the risk of recurrence of renal carcinoma or the recurrence of low-risk prostate cancer compared with dialysis. More reliable evidence is required to recommend a standard waiting period especially for urothelial and testicular carcinomas.
与透析相比,肾移植是终末期肾病患者的肾脏替代治疗金标准,因为它具有更高的存活率和生活质量。当潜在的受者有癌症病史时,肾移植前的等待期通常基于辛辛那提登记处。
系统回顾所有关于有泌尿系统癌症病史的终末期肾病患者癌症复发风险的现有证据。
截至 2017 年 3 月,通过 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆检索所有报告接受移植或继续透析的患者泌尿系统癌症肿瘤学结果的相关文献。主要结局是肿瘤复发时间。次要结局包括癌症特异性和总生存率。根据方法学和临床异质性,对数据进行叙述性综合。评估了每个纳入研究的偏倚风险。
纳入了 32 项回顾性研究,共纳入 2519 例患者(1733 例透析,786 例肾移植)。对于肾细胞癌,移植和透析之间的复发、癌症特异性和总生存率风险相似。对于前列腺癌,大多数肿瘤的预后与诺莫图一致,预后良好。涉及尿路上皮癌(UC)的研究主要包括马兜铃酸肾病背景下的上尿路上皮 UC,其同步双侧肿瘤和复发风险较高。关于睾丸癌的数据很少。
肾移植后的免疫抑制并不影响低危肾细胞癌和前列腺癌的结果和自然病史。因此,可以减少这些癌症成功治疗后到移植的等待时间。由于数据较少,除了马兜铃酸肾病的特殊情况外,还需要更多的研究来标准化 UC 后的等待期。
与透析相比,肾移植似乎不会增加肾细胞癌或低危前列腺癌的复发风险。需要更可靠的证据来推荐特别是对尿路上皮癌和睾丸癌的标准等待期。