The Efficacy and Safety of Mizoribine versus Mycophenolate Mofetil for the Treatment of Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND

Mizoribine (MZR) is widely used in Asia due to its high safety and low cost, and comparative studies of its safety and efficacy with the first-line drug mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been carried out. This paper aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of MZR and MMF in immunosuppressive therapy of renal transplantation by meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MZR versus MMF for renal transplantation in PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM). Articles were assessed for their risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration. Forest plots and funnel plots were also performed on the included articles.

RESULTS

A total of twelve studies with 1103 patients were selected in the analysis. No significant difference were observed between the MZR group and the MMF group for the rate of acute rejection (RR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.01,  = 0.008), patient survival (RR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.03,  = 0.56), graft survival (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.04,  = 0.12), leucopenia (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.10,  = 0.12), and liver damage (RR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.13,  = 0.15). The MZR group was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal disorder (RR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.62,  = 0.002) and cytomegalovirus infection (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.84,  = 0.003) but had a higher risk of hyperuricemia (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.75,  = 0.007). No significant publication bias was observed among included studies. . MZR is similar to MMF in efficacy, and in terms of safety, MZR has a lower risk of gastrointestinal disorder and cytomegalovirus infection but a higher risk of hyperuricemia.