• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外循环心输出量(esCCO)与容积视图在心脏手术患者中测量心输出量趋势的能力比较。

Comparison of the ability of esCCO and Volume View to measure trends in cardiac output in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

作者信息

Dache Stephanie, Van Rompaey Nicolas, Joosten Alexandre, Desebbe Olivier, Saxena Sarah, Eynden Frederic Vanden, Van Aelbrouck Caroline, Huybrechts Isabelle, Obbergh Luc Van, Barvais Luc

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(3):175-180. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2017.0043.

DOI:10.5603/AIT.2017.0043
PMID:28803439
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac output (CO) is a physiological variable that should be monitored during cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the trending ability of two CO monitors, esCCO (Nihon Kohden™, Tokyo, Japan) and Volume View (VV) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, USA).

METHODS

A total of 19 patients were included in the study. Before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), CO was measured simultaneously using both esCCO and VV devices before and after three CO-modifying manoeuvres (passive leg raise [PLR], the end expiratory occlusion test [EEOT] and positive end expiratory pressure [PEEP] at 10 cm H₂O). Five CO values for esCCO and three for VV were averaged and compared during a one-minute period of time before and after each manoeuvre.

RESULTS

A total of 114 paired readings were collected. Median CO values were 4.3 L min⁻¹ (IQR: 3.8; 5.2) and 3.8 L min⁻¹ (IQR: 3.5; 4.5) for esCCO and VV, respectively. The precision error was 1.4% (95% CI:1.0-1.7) for esCCO and 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8-2.7) for VV. The bias between esCCO and VV values was normally distributed (P = 0.0596). Between esCCO and VV, the mean bias was +0.6 L min⁻¹ with a Limit of Agreement (LOA) of -1.8 L min⁻¹ and +3.0 L min⁻¹. The concordance rate was 43% (95% CI: 29-58) between esCCO and VV.

CONCLUSION

Both single and trended measurements of CO using esCCO and VV were not in agreement. This large discrepancy leads one to the conclusion that any outcome study conducted with one of these devices cannot be applied to the other.

摘要

背景

心输出量(CO)是心脏手术期间应监测的生理变量。本研究的目的是评估两种心输出量监测仪,即esCCO(日本光电株式会社,东京,日本)和容积视图(VV)(爱德华生命科学公司,尔湾,美国)的趋势监测能力。

方法

本研究共纳入19例患者。在体外循环(CPB)前,在三种改变心输出量的操作(被动抬腿[PLR]、呼气末阻断试验[EEOT]和10 cm H₂O的呼气末正压[PEEP])前后,同时使用esCCO和VV设备测量心输出量。在每次操作前后的一分钟内,对esCCO的五个心输出量值和VV的三个心输出量值进行平均并比较。

结果

共收集了114对读数。esCCO和VV的心输出量中位数分别为4.3 L min⁻¹(四分位间距:3.8;5.2)和3.8 L min⁻¹(四分位间距:3.5;4.5)。esCCO的精确误差为1.4%(95%置信区间:1.0 - 1.7),VV的精确误差为2.2%(95%置信区间:1.8 - 2.7)。esCCO和VV值之间的偏差呈正态分布(P = 0.0596)。在esCCO和VV之间,平均偏差为 +0.6 L min⁻¹,一致性界限(LOA)为 -1.8 L min⁻¹和 +3.0 L min⁻¹。esCCO和VV之间的一致率为43%(95%置信区间:29 - 58)。

结论

使用esCCO和VV进行的心输出量单次测量和趋势测量均不一致。这种巨大差异导致得出这样的结论:使用其中一种设备进行的任何结果研究都不能应用于另一种设备。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the ability of esCCO and Volume View to measure trends in cardiac output in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.体外循环心输出量(esCCO)与容积视图在心脏手术患者中测量心输出量趋势的能力比较。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(3):175-180. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2017.0043.
2
The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和体外二氧化碳清除(esCCO)监测仪在心脏手术后肺泡复张手法中测量心输出量趋势的能力:与肺热稀释法的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Aug;121(2):383-91. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000753.
3
Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.基于脉搏波传播时间的非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中连续心输出量的估计:与经肺热稀释法的比较
J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Apr;31(2):361-370. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9853-5. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
4
Cardiac Output Measurements Based on the Pulse Wave Transit Time and Thoracic Impedance Exhibit Limited Agreement With Thermodilution Method During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.基于脉搏波传播时间和胸阻抗的心输出量测量在原位肝移植期间与热稀释法的一致性有限。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jan;126(1):85-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002171.
5
Accuracy of noninvasive estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) compared to thermodilution cardiac output: a pilot study in cardiac patients.非侵入性连续心输出量估计值(esCCO)与热稀释心输出量的准确性比较:心脏患者的初步研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec;27(6):1128-32. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.019. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
6
Clinical validation of pulse contour and pulse wave transit time-based continuous cardiac output analyses in Thai patients undergoing cardiac surgery.基于脉搏轮廓和脉搏波传导时间的连续心输出量分析在泰国心脏手术患者中的临床验证
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Jan;97 Suppl 1:S55-60.
7
Ability of esCCO to track changes in cardiac output.esCCO 监测心输出量变化的能力。
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Sep;115(3):403-10. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev219. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
8
Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.两种连续心输出量监测仪测量心输出量趋势能力的比较:通过改良脉搏波传播时间测量的估计连续心输出量和基于动脉脉搏轮廓的心输出量装置。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Oct;30(5):621-7. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9772-x. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
9
Multicenter study verifying a method of noninvasive continuous cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time: a comparison with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output.多中心研究验证了一种使用脉搏波传导时间的非侵入性连续心输出量测量方法:与间歇性热稀释心输出量的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2012 Jul;115(1):82-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824e2b6c. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
10
The ability of a new continuous cardiac output monitor to measure trends in cardiac output following implementation of a patient information calibration and an automated exclusion algorithm.新型连续心输出量监测仪在实施患者信息校准和自动排除算法后测量心输出量趋势的能力。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Dec;26(6):465-71. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9384-7. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac output and stroke volume variation measured by the pulse wave transit time method: a comparison with an arterial pressure-based cardiac output system.脉搏波传导时间法测量心输出量和每搏量变异与基于动脉压的心输出量系统的比较。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Jun;33(3):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0171-y. Epub 2018 Jun 14.