• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线分发渠道增加了文章在Mendeley上的使用量：一项随机对照试验。

Online distribution channel increases article usage on Mendeley: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Kudlow Paul, Cockerill Matthew, Toccalino Danielle, Dziadyk Devin Bissky, Rutledge Alan, Shachak Aviv, McIntyre Roger S, Ravindran Arun, Eysenbach Gunther

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Clinician-Investigator Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.

Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.

出版信息

Scientometrics. 2017;112(3):1537-1556. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2438-3. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11192-017-2438-3
PMID:28804178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5533832/
Abstract

Prior research shows that article reader counts (i.e. saves) on the online reference manager, Mendeley, correlate to future citations. There are currently no evidenced-based distribution strategies that have been shown to increase article saves on Mendeley. We conducted a 4-week randomized controlled trial to examine how promotion of article links in a novel online cross-publisher distribution channel (TrendMD) affect article saves on Mendeley. Four hundred articles published in the were randomized to either the TrendMD arm ( = 200) or the control arm ( = 200) of the study. Our primary outcome compares the 4-week mean Mendeley saves of articles randomized to TrendMD versus control. Articles randomized to TrendMD showed a 77% increase in article saves on Mendeley relative to control. The difference in mean Mendeley saves for TrendMD articles versus control was 2.7, 95% CI (2.63, 2.77), and statistically significant ( < 0.01). There was a positive correlation between pageviews driven by TrendMD and article saves on Mendeley (Spearman's rho  = 0.60). This is the first randomized controlled trial to show how an online cross-publisher distribution channel (TrendMD) enhances article saves on Mendeley. While replication and further study are needed, these data suggest that cross-publisher article recommendations via TrendMD may enhance citations of scholarly articles.

摘要

先前的研究表明，在线参考文献管理器Mendeley上的文章阅读量（即保存量）与未来的引用次数相关。目前尚无经证实的能增加Mendeley上文章保存量的传播策略。我们进行了一项为期4周的随机对照试验，以研究在一个新型的在线跨出版商传播渠道（TrendMD）中推广文章链接如何影响Mendeley上的文章保存量。在[具体期刊名称]上发表的400篇文章被随机分配到该研究的TrendMD组（n = 200）或对照组（n = 200）。我们的主要结果是比较随机分配到TrendMD组与对照组的文章在4周内Mendeley保存量的均值。随机分配到TrendMD组的文章在Mendeley上的保存量相对于对照组增加了77%。TrendMD组文章与对照组文章在Mendeley保存量均值上的差异为2.7，95%置信区间（2.63，2.77），且具有统计学显著性（P < 0.01）。TrendMD带来的页面浏览量与Mendeley上的文章保存量之间存在正相关（斯皮尔曼相关系数rho = 0.60）。这是第一项表明在线跨出版商传播渠道（TrendMD）如何提高Mendeley上文章保存量的随机对照试验。虽然需要重复研究和进一步探究，但这些数据表明，通过TrendMD进行跨出版商文章推荐可能会增加学术文章的引用次数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/7524ff2b60c6/11192_2017_2438_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/af09efef2c1a/11192_2017_2438_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/4a6f9f9e1bfb/11192_2017_2438_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/3bdb8740ea8c/11192_2017_2438_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/6414ab7f7d83/11192_2017_2438_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/f5c67efa367d/11192_2017_2438_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/a80f2d2e4e6f/11192_2017_2438_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/4f1ce1fdee70/11192_2017_2438_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/74367fa42da3/11192_2017_2438_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/71cea6e491bc/11192_2017_2438_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/7524ff2b60c6/11192_2017_2438_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/af09efef2c1a/11192_2017_2438_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/4a6f9f9e1bfb/11192_2017_2438_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/3bdb8740ea8c/11192_2017_2438_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/6414ab7f7d83/11192_2017_2438_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/f5c67efa367d/11192_2017_2438_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/a80f2d2e4e6f/11192_2017_2438_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/4f1ce1fdee70/11192_2017_2438_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/74367fa42da3/11192_2017_2438_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/71cea6e491bc/11192_2017_2438_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ad/5533832/7524ff2b60c6/11192_2017_2438_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Online distribution channel increases article usage on Mendeley: a randomized controlled trial.在线分发渠道增加了文章在Mendeley上的使用量：一项随机对照试验。
Scientometrics. 2017;112(3):1537-1556. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2438-3. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
2
Citation Advantage of Promoted Articles in a Cross-Publisher Distribution Platform: 36-Month Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial.在跨出版商分发平台上推广文章的引文优势：一项随机对照试验的 36 个月随访。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 10;23(12):e34051. doi: 10.2196/34051.
3
The impact of Twitter/X promotion on visibility of research articles: Results of the #TweetTheJournal study.推特/X推广对研究论文可见性的影响：#推送该期刊研究的结果
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023 Dec 23;50:101328. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101328. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Comparing alternative and traditional dissemination metrics in medical education.比较医学教育中的替代性传播指标和传统传播指标。
Med Educ. 2017 Sep;51(9):935-941. doi: 10.1111/medu.13359. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
5
Measuring the social impact of dental research: An insight into the most influential articles on the Web.衡量口腔医学研究的社会影响力：网络上最具影响力文章的深度分析。
Oral Dis. 2017 Nov;23(8):1155-1161. doi: 10.1111/odi.12714. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
6
Alternative Metrics ("Altmetrics") for Assessing Article Impact in Popular General Radiology Journals.用于评估大众普通放射学期刊文章影响力的替代计量指标（“替代计量学”）
Acad Radiol. 2017 Jul;24(7):891-897. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.019. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
7
Beyond Citation Rates: A Real-Time Impact Analysis of Health Professions Education Research Using Altmetrics.超越引文率：使用替代计量学对卫生专业教育研究进行实时影响分析。
Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1449-1455. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001897.
8
Looking Beyond Traditional Metrics in Orthodontics: An Altmetric Study on the Most Discussed Articles on the Web.超越正畸学传统指标：关于网络上讨论最多文章的替代计量学研究
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Apr 6;40(2):193-199. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx050.
9
Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.荟萃分析：俄罗斯出版物存在的问题。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S89-90. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150702.
10
The dissemination of brain imaging guidelines and recommendations.脑成像指南与建议的传播。
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2021 Dec 2;12:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2021.11.003. eCollection 2022 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Slow, slow, quick, quick, slow: five altmetric sources observed over a decade show evolving trends, by research age, attention source maturity and open access status.慢，慢，快，快，慢：十年间观察到的五个替代计量学来源按研究年龄、关注度来源成熟度和开放获取状态呈现出不断演变的趋势。
Scientometrics. 2023;128(4):2175-2200. doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04653-1. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
2
Citation Advantage of Promoted Articles in a Cross-Publisher Distribution Platform: 36-Month Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial.在跨出版商分发平台上推广文章的引文优势：一项随机对照试验的 36 个月随访。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 10;23(12):e34051. doi: 10.2196/34051.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Viability of Social Media for Disseminating Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline Through Content Analysis of Twitter Messages and Health Professional Interviews: An Observational Study.通过推特信息内容分析和健康专业人士访谈评估社交媒体传播循证营养实践指南的可行性：一项观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 15;18(11):e295. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5811.
2
Randomized Controlled Trial of Social Media: Effect of Increased Intensity of the Intervention.社交媒体随机对照试验：干预强度增加的效果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Apr 27;5(5):e003088. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003088.
3
Letter by Dixon et al regarding article, "A randomized trial of social media from Circulation".
迪克森等人就《循环》杂志上的文章《社交媒体的随机试验》所写的信。
Circulation. 2015 Mar 31;131(13):e393. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014460.
4
Letter by Thoma et al regarding article, "A randomized trial of social media from Circulation".托马等人就《循环》杂志上的文章《社交媒体的随机试验》所写的信。
Circulation. 2015 Mar 31;131(13):e392. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014441.
5
A randomized trial of social media from Circulation.随机试验来自 Circulation 的社交媒体。
Circulation. 2015 Jan 6;131(1):28-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013509. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
6
Ten simple rules for writing a literature review.撰写文献综述的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(7):e1003149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
7
Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services.社交媒体计量指标是否有效？以推特和其他十个社交媒体服务为例
PLoS One. 2013 May 28;8(5):e64841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841. Print 2013.
8
Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact.推文能否预测引用量？基于推特的社会影响力指标及其与传统科学影响力指标的相关性。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 19;13(4):e123. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2012.
9
Introduction to multivariate regression analysis.多元回归分析简介。
Hippokratia. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 1):23-8.
10
Sample size calculation.样本量计算。
Int J Ayurveda Res. 2010 Jan;1(1):55-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-7788.59946.