• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pharmacogenetic Biomarkers to Predict Treatment Response in Multiple Sclerosis: Current and Future Perspectives.预测多发性硬化症治疗反应的药物遗传生物标志物:现状与未来展望
Mult Scler Int. 2017;2017:6198530. doi: 10.1155/2017/6198530. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
2
Comparative pharmacogenetics of multiple sclerosis: IFN-β versus glatiramer acetate.多发性硬化症的比较药物遗传学:干扰素-β与那他珠单抗。
Pharmacogenomics. 2014 Apr;15(5):679-85. doi: 10.2217/pgs.14.26.
3
Multiple sclerosis: current and emerging disease-modifying therapies and treatment strategies.多发性硬化症:现有和新兴的疾病修正治疗方法和治疗策略。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Feb;89(2):225-40. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.002.
4
Teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis.特立氟胺用于治疗多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 22;3(3):CD009882. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009882.pub3.
5
Association of Initial Disease-Modifying Therapy With Later Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.初始疾病修饰治疗与随后继发进展性多发性硬化转化的相关性。
JAMA. 2019 Jan 15;321(2):175-187. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.20588.
6
Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis.与其他用于治疗多发性硬化症的疾病修正疗法相比,奥瑞珠单抗相关的工作生产力结果。
Neurol Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):183-196. doi: 10.1007/s40120-020-00224-1. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
7
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.用于多发性硬化症的免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD008933. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008933.pub2.
8
Factors influencing patients' willingness-to-pay for disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis.影响患者对多发性硬化症疾病修正疗法支付意愿的因素。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Feb;48:102720. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102720. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
9
Teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis.特立氟胺用于治疗多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD009882. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009882.pub2.
10
Comparative Efficacy of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Therapies: Model-Based Meta-Analyses for Confirmed Disability Accumulation and Annualized Relapse Rate.复发型多发性硬化症治疗方案的疗效比较:基于模型的荟萃分析评估确认残疾进展和年化复发率。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Aug;64:103908. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103908. Epub 2022 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Twenty Years of Subcutaneous Interferon-Beta-1a for Multiple Sclerosis: Contemporary Perspectives.皮下注射干扰素β-1a治疗多发性硬化症二十年:当代观点
Neurol Ther. 2024 Apr;13(2):283-322. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00565-7. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
2
Influence of Genetic Polymorphisms on Clinical Outcomes of Glatiramer Acetate in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.基因多态性对多发性硬化症患者醋酸格拉替雷临床结局的影响。
J Pers Med. 2021 Oct 15;11(10):1032. doi: 10.3390/jpm11101032.
3
B-Cell Activity Predicts Response to Glatiramer Acetate and Interferon in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.B 细胞活性可预测复发缓解型多发性硬化症对格拉替雷和干扰素的应答。
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021 Mar 11;8(3). doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000980. Print 2021 May.
4
Functional relevance of the multi-drug transporter abcg2 on teriflunomide therapy in an animal model of multiple sclerosis.多药转运体 abcg2 在多发性硬化症动物模型中对特立氟胺治疗的功能相关性。
J Neuroinflammation. 2020 Jan 8;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1677-z.
5
Enduring Clinical Value of Copaxone® (Glatiramer Acetate) in Multiple Sclerosis after 20 Years of Use.使用20年后,考帕松(醋酸格拉替雷)在多发性硬化症中的持久临床价值。
Mult Scler Int. 2019 Jan 15;2019:7151685. doi: 10.1155/2019/7151685. eCollection 2019.
6
Inflammasome Proteins As Biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis.炎性小体蛋白作为多发性硬化症的生物标志物
Front Neurol. 2018 Mar 19;9:135. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00135. eCollection 2018.
7
Towards a better understanding of the cannabinoid-related orphan receptors GPR3, GPR6, and GPR12.旨在深入了解大麻素相关孤儿受体 GPR3、GPR6 和 GPR12。
Drug Metab Rev. 2018 Feb;50(1):74-93. doi: 10.1080/03602532.2018.1428616. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple sclerosis: genetics, biomarkers, treatments.多发性硬化症:遗传学、生物标志物与治疗方法
Curr Opin Neurol. 2016 Jun;29(3):345-53. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000319.
2
Validation of a rapid test for HLA-B*58:01/57:01 allele screening to detect individuals at risk for drug-induced hypersensitivity.用于检测药物性超敏反应风险个体的HLA-B*58:01/57:01等位基因筛查快速检测方法的验证
Pharmacogenomics. 2016 Apr;17(5):473-80. doi: 10.2217/pgs.15.185. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
3
The risk of smoking on multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis based on 20,626 cases from case-control and cohort studies.吸烟与多发性硬化症的风险:基于病例对照研究和队列研究中20626例病例的荟萃分析。
PeerJ. 2016 Mar 15;4:e1797. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1797. eCollection 2016.
4
Response to interferon-beta treatment in multiple sclerosis patients: a genome-wide association study.多发性硬化症患者对β-干扰素治疗的反应:一项全基因组关联研究。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2017 Jul;17(4):312-318. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2016.20. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
5
A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Prevention of Adverse Drug Reactions.药物基因检测预防药物不良反应的经济学评价系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Aug;34(8):771-93. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0397-9.
6
Pharmacogenomics strategies to optimize treatments for multiple sclerosis: Insights from clinical research.优化多发性硬化症治疗的药物基因组学策略:来自临床研究的见解
Prog Neurobiol. 2017 May;152:114-130. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
7
A gene expression study denies the ability of 25 candidate biomarkers to predict the interferon-beta treatment response in multiple sclerosis patients.一项基因表达研究否定了25种候选生物标志物预测多发性硬化症患者干扰素β治疗反应的能力。
J Neuroimmunol. 2016 Mar 15;292:34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
8
Cytokine profiles show heterogeneity of interferon-β response in multiple sclerosis patients.细胞因子谱显示多发性硬化症患者对干扰素-β反应的异质性。
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016 Jan 27;3(2):e202. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000202. eCollection 2016 Apr.
9
Multiple sclerosis prevalence in the United States commercially insured population.美国商业保险人群中的多发性硬化症患病率。
Neurology. 2016 Mar 15;86(11):1014-21. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002469. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症的流行病学
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2016 Jan;172(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

预测多发性硬化症治疗反应的药物遗传生物标志物:现状与未来展望

Pharmacogenetic Biomarkers to Predict Treatment Response in Multiple Sclerosis: Current and Future Perspectives.

作者信息

Coyle Patricia K

机构信息

Department of Neurology and MS Comprehensive Care Center, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.

出版信息

Mult Scler Int. 2017;2017:6198530. doi: 10.1155/2017/6198530. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1155/2017/6198530
PMID:28804651
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5540248/
Abstract

Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have significantly advanced the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), decreasing the frequency of relapses, disability, and magnetic resonance imaging lesion formation. However, patients' responses to and tolerability of DMTs vary considerably, creating an unmet need for biomarkers to identify likely responders and/or those who may have treatment-limiting adverse reactions. Most studies in MS have focused on the identification of pharmacogenetic markers, using either the candidate-gene approach, which requires prior knowledge of the genetic marker and its role in the target disease, or genome-wide association, which examines multiple genetic variants, typically single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Both approaches have implicated numerous alleles and SNPs in response to selected MS DMTs. None have been validated for use in clinical practice. This review covers pharmacogenetic markers in clinical practice in other diseases and then reviews the current status of MS DMT markers (interferon , glatiramer acetate, and mitoxantrone). For a complex disease such as MS, multiple biomarkers may need to be evaluated simultaneously to identify potential responders. Efforts to identify relevant biomarkers are underway and will need to be expanded to all MS DMTs. These will require extensive validation in large patient groups before they can be used in clinical practice.

摘要

疾病修饰疗法(DMTs)显著推进了复发型多发性硬化症(MS)的治疗,降低了复发频率、残疾程度以及磁共振成像病变的形成。然而,患者对DMTs的反应和耐受性差异很大,因此对生物标志物的需求尚未得到满足,以识别可能的反应者和/或那些可能有治疗限制性不良反应的患者。MS的大多数研究都集中在药物遗传学标志物的识别上,采用候选基因方法,该方法需要事先了解遗传标志物及其在目标疾病中的作用,或者全基因组关联研究,该研究检查多个遗传变异,通常是单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)。两种方法都表明了许多等位基因和SNP与选定的MS DMTs反应有关。但均未在临床实践中得到验证。本综述涵盖了其他疾病临床实践中的药物遗传学标志物,然后回顾了MS DMT标志物(干扰素、醋酸格拉替雷和米托蒽醌)的现状。对于像MS这样的复杂疾病,可能需要同时评估多个生物标志物以识别潜在的反应者。识别相关生物标志物的工作正在进行,并且需要扩展到所有MS DMTs。在这些生物标志物能够用于临床实践之前,需要在大量患者群体中进行广泛验证。