Suppr超能文献

限饲对家兔辣木和银合欢摄入量及生长性能的影响。

Effect of feed restriction on intake of Moringa oleifera and Leucaena leucocephala and growth performance of rabbits.

作者信息

Santos-Ricalde R, Gutiérrez-Ruiz E, Novelo-Ucan W, Martinez-Romero P, Segura-Correa J

机构信息

Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan (UADY), Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.

出版信息

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2017 Dec;49(8):1685-1688. doi: 10.1007/s11250-017-1377-6. Epub 2017 Aug 13.

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of feed restriction on intake of Moringa oleifera (MO) or Leucaena leucocephala (LL) and growth of rabbits. In experiment one, 45 rabbits (male and female) weighing 1.18 ± 0.15 kg were used. They were randomly distributed to three feed restriction treatments (20, 30, and 40%) with 15 rabbits each (9 females and 6 males) and they were offered M. oleifera (MO) ad libitum. In experiment two, 45 growing male rabbits weighing 0.63 ± 0.113 kg were used. They were randomly assigned to 0, 20, and 30% feed restriction diets, and they have free access to L. leucocephala (LL). Intake of MO increased (P < 0.05) conforming feed restriction increased (40.6, 52.9, and 55.2 g/day of MO for 20, 30, and 40%, respectively). Daily liveweight gain and feed conversion did not differ (P > 0.05), and economic efficiency was similar among treatments. Consumption of LL increased (P < 0.05) in rabbits under the 30% restriction treatment in comparison to that of rabbits restricted 20% (46.0 and 44.4 g/day, respectively). Total feed intake (LL + feed) was highest in 20% restricted rabbits (108.0, 100.8, and 93.2 g/day for 20, 30, and 0%, respectively). Daily liveweight gain and feed conversion were not affected by feed restriction (P > 0.05). Economic efficiency improved twice in feed-restricted rabbits (2.0 and 2.3 for 20 and 30%, respectively) in contrast to that of the control 0% group (1.1). The results suggest that rabbits restricted up to 30% and supplemented with either MO or LL did not affect growth performance and reduced feed cost.

摘要

进行了两项试验以评估限饲对家兔辣木(MO)或银合欢(LL)采食量及生长的影响。在试验一中,选用45只体重为1.18±0.15千克的家兔(雌雄皆有)。它们被随机分为三种限饲处理组(20%、30%和40%),每组15只(9只雌性和6只雄性),并随意提供辣木(MO)。在试验二中,选用45只体重为0.63±0.113千克的生长雄性家兔。它们被随机分配到0%、20%和30%限饲日粮组,并可自由采食银合欢(LL)。随着限饲程度增加(20%、30%和40%限饲组的MO采食量分别为40.6、52.9和55.2克/天),辣木采食量增加(P<0.05)。日增重和饲料转化率无差异(P>0.05),各处理间经济效益相似。与20%限饲组家兔相比,30%限饲组家兔的银合欢采食量增加(P<0.05)(分别为46.0和44.4克/天)。20%限饲组家兔的总采食量(LL+饲料)最高(20%、30%和0%限饲组分别为108.0、100.8和93.2克/天)。限饲对家兔的日增重和饲料转化率无影响(P>0.05)。与对照组0%组(1.1)相比,限饲家兔的经济效益提高了两倍(20%和30%限饲组分别为2.0和2.3)。结果表明,限饲30%并补充辣木或银合欢不影响家兔生长性能,且降低了饲料成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验