Safwat A M, Sarmiento-Franco L, Santos-Ricalde R H, Nieves D, Sandoval-Castro C A
Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan (UADY), Mérida, Yucatán 97000, Mexico ; Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21526, Egypt .
Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan (UADY), Mérida, Yucatán 97000, Mexico.
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015 Aug;28(8):1155-62. doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0429.
This study aimed to evaluate the nutrient digestibility of growing rabbits fed diets with different levels of either Leucaena leucocephala (LLM) or Moringa oleifera (MOLM) leaf meals and also to compare total collection and TiO2 marker methods for estimating digestibility. A total of 30 California growing rabbits (1.81±0.19 kg live weight on average) were randomly distributed into five experimental groups of six rabbits each and were housed in individual cages. The groups were control, 30% LLM, 40% LLM, 30% MOLM, and 40% MOLM. All groups received pelleted diets for two weeks; diets also contained 4 g/kg titanium dioxide as dietary marker. Daily feed intake was recorded during the whole experimental period and total feces were collected daily and weighed individually during four days. The results showed that there were no difference (p>0.05) in feed, dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), digestible energy, and crude fiber (CF) intake between the control group and the other experimental groups. The apparent digestibility values of DM, OM, CP, CF, acid detergent fiber, and gross energy were the highest for control group (p = 0.001), meanwhile MOLM diets had generally higher nutrient digestibility coefficients than LLM diets. Increasing the inclusion level of leaf meal in the diet from 30% to 40% improved the digestibility of CF from 45.02% to 51.69% for LLM and from 48.11% to 55.89% for MOLM. Similar results for apparent nutrient digestibility coefficients were obtained when either total collection or indigestible marker method was used. In conclusion, the digestibility of MOLM containing diets were better than LLM diets, furthermore TiO2 as an external marker could be used as a simple, practical and reliable method to estimate nutrients digestibility in rabbit diets.
本研究旨在评估饲喂不同水平银合欢(LLM)或辣木叶粉(MOLM)日粮的生长兔的养分消化率,并比较全收粪法和二氧化钛标记法对消化率的估计。总共30只加利福尼亚生长兔(平均体重1.81±0.19千克)被随机分为五个实验组,每组六只,单独饲养在笼子里。分组为对照组、30%LLM组、40%LLM组、30%MOLM组和40%MOLM组。所有组均饲喂颗粒饲料两周;日粮中还含有4克/千克二氧化钛作为日粮标记物。在整个实验期间记录每日采食量,并在四天内每天收集全部粪便并分别称重。结果表明,对照组与其他实验组在采食量、干物质(DM)、有机物(OM)、粗蛋白(CP)、消化能和粗纤维(CF)摄入量方面没有差异(p>0.05)。对照组的DM、OM、CP、CF、酸性洗涤纤维和总能的表观消化率值最高(p = 0.001),同时MOLM日粮的养分消化率系数总体上高于LLM日粮。日粮中叶粉添加水平从30%提高到40%时,LLM组CF的消化率从45.02%提高到51.69%,MOLM组从48.11%提高到55.89%。使用全收粪法或不可消化标记法时,表观养分消化率系数得到类似结果。总之,含MOLM日粮的消化率优于LLM日粮,此外,二氧化钛作为外部标记物可作为一种简单、实用且可靠的方法来估计兔日粮中的养分消化率。