Hodnick Ryan, Zitek Tony, Galster Kellen, Johnson Stephen, Bledsoe Bryan, Ebbs Daniel
1Santa Fe Fire Department,Santa Fe,New MexicoUSA.
7University of Nevada Department of Emergency Medicine,Las Vegas,NevadaUSA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Dec;32(6):621-624. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17006872. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
The primary goal of this study was to compare paramedic first pass success rate between two different video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy (DL) under simulated prehospital conditions in a cadaveric model.
This was a non-randomized, group-controlled trial in which five non-embalmed, non-frozen cadavers were intubated under prehospital spinal immobilization conditions using DL and with both the GlideScope Ranger (GL; Verathon Inc, Bothell, Washington USA) and the VividTrac VT-A100 (VT; Vivid Medical, Palo Alto, California USA). Participants had to intubate each cadaver with each of the three devices (DL, GL, or VT) in a randomly assigned order. Paramedics were given 31 seconds for an intubation attempt and a maximum of three attempts per device to successfully intubate each cadaver. Confirmation of successful endotracheal intubation (ETI) was confirmed by one of the six on-site physicians.
Successful ETI within three attempts across all devices occurred 99.5% of the time overall and individually 98.5% of the time for VT, 100.0% of the time for GL, and 100.0% of the time for DL. First pass success overall was 64.4%. Individually, first pass success was 60.0% for VT, 68.8% for GL, and 64.5% for DL. A chi-square test revealed no statistically significant difference amongst the three devices for first pass success rates (P=.583). Average time to successful intubation was 42.2 seconds for VT, 38.0 seconds for GL, and 33.7 for seconds for DL. The average number of intubation attempts for each device were as follows: 1.48 for VT, 1.40 for GL, and 1.42 for DL.
The was no statistically significant difference in first pass or overall successful ETI rates between DL and video laryngoscopy (VL) with either the GL or VT (adult). Hodnick R , Zitek T , Galster K , Johnson S , Bledsoe B , Ebbs D . A comparison of paramedic first pass endotracheal intubation success rate of the VividTrac VT-A 100, GlideScope Ranger, and direct laryngoscopy under simulated prehospital cervical spinal immobilization conditions in a cadaveric model. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(6):621-624.
本研究的主要目标是在尸体模型的模拟院前条件下,比较两种不同视频喉镜与直接喉镜(DL)的护理人员首次插管成功率。
这是一项非随机、组对照试验,在院前脊柱固定条件下,使用DL以及GlideScope Ranger(GL;美国华盛顿州博塞尔市Verathon公司)和VividTrac VT - A100(VT;美国加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托市Vivid Medical公司)对5具未防腐、未冷冻的尸体进行插管。参与者必须按照随机分配的顺序,使用三种设备(DL、GL或VT)中的每一种对每具尸体进行插管。护理人员有31秒的时间进行插管尝试,每种设备对每具尸体最多进行三次尝试以成功插管。由现场六名医生中的一名确认气管插管成功(ETI)。
所有设备在三次尝试内成功进行ETI的总体发生率为99.5%,其中VT单独发生率为98.5%,GL为100.0%,DL为100.0%。总体首次通过成功率为64.4%。单独来看,VT的首次通过成功率为60.0%,GL为68.8%,DL为64.5%。卡方检验显示三种设备的首次通过成功率之间无统计学显著差异(P = 0.583)。VT成功插管的平均时间为42.2秒,GL为38.0秒,DL为33.7秒。每种设备的平均插管尝试次数如下:VT为1.48次,GL为1.40次,DL为1.42次。
在尸体模型的模拟院前颈椎固定条件下,DL与使用GL或VT的视频喉镜(VL)(成人)在首次通过或总体成功ETI率方面无统计学显著差异。霍德尼克R、齐泰克T、加尔斯特K、约翰逊S、布莱索B、埃布斯D。在尸体模型的模拟院前颈椎固定条件下,VividTrac VT - A 100、GlideScope Ranger和直接喉镜的护理人员首次通过气管插管成功率的比较。《院前灾难医学》。2017;32(6):621 - 624。