DeMuro Paul R, Ash Joan, Middleton Blackford, Fletcher Justin, Madison Cecelia J
Broad and Cassel LLP.
Oregon Health & Science University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;241:69-75.
Little research has been conducted about the quality, benefits, costs, and financial considerations associated with health information technology (HIT), particularly informatics technologies, such as e-prescribing, from the perspective of all its stakeholders.
This research effort sought to identify the stakeholders involved in e-prescribing and to identify and rank-order the positives and the negatives from the perspective of the stakeholders to create a framework to assist in the development of incentives and payment mechanisms which result in better managed care.
The Delphi method was employed by enlisting a panel of experts. They were presented with the results of initial research in an online survey of questions which sought to prioritize the quality, benefit, cost, and financial effects of e-prescribing from the perspective of each stakeholder. From the results of this study, a framework was presented to framework experts.
The experts added stakeholders and positives and negatives to the initial lists and rank-ordered the positives and negatives of e-prescribing from the perspective of each stakeholder. The aggregate results were summarized by category of stakeholder. The framework experts evaluated the framework.
Positives and negatives can be rank-ordered from the perspective of each stakeholder. A useful framework was created.
从所有利益相关者的角度来看,关于健康信息技术(HIT),特别是诸如电子处方等信息学技术的质量、益处、成本和财务考量的研究很少。
本研究旨在确定参与电子处方的利益相关者,并从利益相关者的角度识别并对积极因素和消极因素进行排序,以创建一个框架,协助制定激励措施和支付机制,从而实现更好的管理式医疗。
通过招募一个专家小组采用德尔菲法。在一项在线调查中向他们展示了初步研究的结果,该调查的问题旨在从每个利益相关者的角度对电子处方的质量、益处、成本和财务影响进行优先级排序。根据这项研究的结果,向框架专家展示了一个框架。
专家们在初始列表中增加了利益相关者以及积极因素和消极因素,并从每个利益相关者的角度对电子处方的积极因素和消极因素进行了排序。汇总结果按利益相关者类别进行了总结。框架专家对该框架进行了评估。
可以从每个利益相关者的角度对积极因素和消极因素进行排序。创建了一个有用的框架。