Zatrapa T, Veigl D, Pech J, Landor I, Šimková M
I. ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Praha.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017;84(3):189-195.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Our study aimed to evaluate a group of patients who in the period from 2005 to 2014 underwent a four-corner arthrodesis of the wrist in our department. We also wanted to verify the hypothesis as to whether the use of conventional dorsal plate without the application of bone grafts leads to comparable results as the use of dorsal locking plates and routine application of bone grafts. MATERIAL AND METHODS Throughout the years 2005 to 2014 the four-corner arthrodesis of the wrist was performed in our department in a total of 62 patients, in two cases bilaterally. The indication was the diagnosis of SLAC/SNAC grade III. Normed RondoFix implant was used in all the cases. Following the surgery, the wrist was immobilized by a volar plaster splint for the period of 2 weeks and subsequently orthosis was applied for additional 4 weeks. The wrist mobilisation started in week seven when the orthosis was removed, the patients were allowed full load on the wrist 3 months after the surgery. Our group of patients was evaluated retrospectively, a total of 53 operated wrists in 51 patients were assessed. The assessment was carried out based on a radiograph of the wrist, range of motion, Mayo Modified Wrist Score, DASH Score and grip strength test. RESULTS The mean range of motion in sagittal plane was 63.7°, in frontal plane the mean value was 32.1°. According to the Mayo Modified Wrist Score 37 patients were rated "excellent" or "good". Due to the presence of moderate pain, the result in other 10 patients was assessed as "satisfactory". In a total of 4 patients the result was assessed as "weak", in two of them for a presence of non-union and in other two for severe pain under load. One of these patients underwent bilateral surgery and reported severe pain in both the wrists. Regarding DASH score, the best result equalled 0, the worst 65.83, with the mean of 20.5. The grip strength ranged from 8 to 54 kg, with the mean value of 27.5 kg. In two patients, a non-union occurred. In the first case the extraction of implant and re-arthrodesis was performed due to severe pain and screw migration. The patient is now 22 months after the surgery and the radiographs show that the arthrodesis has healed and the patient has no clinical difficulties. The second patient did not report any difficulties, therefore he is only subject to follow-up. No cases of screw or plate breakage were reported. In one case, the patient reported pain in the region of radial styloid process. A revision was indicated with radial styloidectomy and decompression of tendons of m. extensor pollicis brevis and m. abductor pollicis longus. As a result the patient had no clinical difficulty. One case of wrist radial deviation was recorded. It was managed by corrective wedge osteotomy and reosteosynthesis using a circular dorsal plate. In one patient dorsal impingement occurred, accompanied by limited range of motion and pain. Extraction of OS material was indicated and the patient was relieved of any difficulties. We have recorded aseptic necrosis of lunate bone in one case. DISCUSSION When comparing the functional results such as the range of motion and grip strength, our results are fully comparable to previously published papers. In papers where DASH was referred to, its value ranges from 13 to 29.82, which is fully consistent with our observations with the final value of 20.5. The incidence of non-union and the degree of complications is not deviating from the values included in other publications either. In all the mentioned publications the authors refer to routine use of bone grafts. The publications evaluating the use of locking plates do not report different results either. CONCLUSIONS In case of correct indication, the four-corner arthrodesis of the wrist represents a very good solution. In our group of patients, we confirmed the hypothesis that equally good results as with the use of locking plates can be achieved when using a non-locking plate system. Essential is the proper correction of DISI and primary good congruence between fused carpal bones instead of the use of bone grafts. Key words: SLAC wrist, SNAC wrist, four-corner arthrodesis, partial wrist fusion.
研究目的 我们的研究旨在评估2005年至2014年期间在我院接受腕关节四角融合术的一组患者。我们还想验证一个假设,即使用传统背侧钢板且不应用骨移植与使用背侧锁定钢板并常规应用骨移植是否能产生可比的结果。材料与方法 在2005年至2014年期间,我院共对62例患者进行了腕关节四角融合术,其中2例为双侧手术。手术指征为SLAC/SNAC III级诊断。所有病例均使用标准化的RondoFix植入物。术后,腕关节用掌侧石膏夹板固定2周,随后再使用矫形器4周。术后第7周去除矫形器后开始腕关节活动,术后3个月允许患者腕关节完全负重。我们对这组患者进行了回顾性评估,共评估了51例患者的53个手术腕关节。评估基于腕关节X线片、活动范围、Mayo改良腕关节评分、DASH评分和握力测试。结果 矢状面平均活动范围为63.7°,额状面平均值为32.1°。根据Mayo改良腕关节评分,37例患者被评为“优秀”或“良好”。由于存在中度疼痛,另外10例患者的结果被评估为“满意”。共有4例患者的结果被评估为“差”,其中2例是因为骨不连,另外2例是因为负重时严重疼痛。其中1例患者接受了双侧手术,双侧腕关节均报告有严重疼痛。关于DASH评分,最佳结果为0,最差为65.83,平均值为20.5。握力范围为8至54 kg,平均值为27.5 kg。2例患者发生骨不连。第一例患者因严重疼痛和螺钉移位而取出植入物并再次进行关节融合术。该患者目前术后22个月,X线片显示关节融合已愈合,患者无临床问题。第二例患者未报告任何问题,因此仅进行随访。未报告螺钉或钢板断裂的病例。1例患者报告桡骨茎突区域疼痛。建议进行桡骨茎突切除术及拇短伸肌和拇长展肌腱减压的翻修手术。结果该患者无临床问题。记录到1例腕关节桡侧偏斜。通过矫正楔形截骨术和使用环形背侧钢板进行重新骨合成进行处理。1例患者发生背侧撞击,伴有活动范围受限和疼痛。建议取出植入物材料,患者症状缓解。我们记录到1例月骨无菌性坏死。讨论 在比较诸如活动范围和握力等功能结果时,我们的结果与先前发表的论文完全可比。在提及DASH评分的论文中,其值范围为13至29.82,这与我们最终值为20.5的观察结果完全一致。骨不连的发生率和并发症的程度也与其他出版物中的值没有偏差。在所有上述出版物中,作者均提及常规使用骨移植。评估锁定钢板使用情况的出版物也未报告不同结果。结论 在适应证正确的情况下,腕关节四角融合术是一种非常好的解决方案。在我们的患者组中,我们证实了一个假设,即使用非锁定钢板系统可以获得与使用锁定钢板同样好的结果。关键是正确矫正DISI以及融合腕骨之间的初始良好对合,而不是使用骨移植。关键词:SLAC腕关节;SNAC腕关节;四角融合术;部分腕关节融合