Chirurgie orthopédique, university hospital Center of Amiens, avenue Rene Laennec, 80480 Salouel, France.
Chirurgie orthopédique, university hospital Center of Amiens, avenue Rene Laennec, 80480 Salouel, France.
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2020 Feb;39(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2019.10.196. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
The treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrist varies. No clear consensus exists on surgical indications. Scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis with locking plate is one of preferred treatments for these lesions. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of locking plates for treating SNAC and SLAC wrist after a mean follow-up of 5 years and to compare these outcomes with the results reported in the literature. A retrospective study was conducted in two hospitals, involving 40 patients who underwent scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis with locking plate between January 2006 and September 2016. All patients were reviewed as outpatients with clinical and radiographic measurements. At the last follow-up, the mean pain level on visual analog scale (VAS) was 2.5/10 [0-7] (SD: 1.7). Patients had a mean flexion of 46% and a mean extension of 46% compared to the contralateral side. An 18% gain was observed in grip strength. The mean postoperative QuickDASH score was 30 [0-57] (SD: 15.3). Seventy percent of patients were satisfied with the operation. Complete (all four joint interfaces) joint space fusion was achieved in 55% of patients. Only one patient (2.5%) had no joint fusion. The joint between the lunate and the capitate was fused in 38 patients (95%). Nine patients suffered complications; eight of them required surgical revision (20%). Four-corner arthrodesis with locking plate is a valuable surgical technique for treating SLAC and SNAC wrist because it preserve satisfactory range of motion and grip strength (64% compared to the non-operated side), maintains the height of the carpus and prevents the premature appearance of radiocarpal osteoarthritis, as long as the technical challenges of this procedure are mastered.
舟月骨进行性塌陷(SLAC)和舟骨不愈合性进行性塌陷(SNAC)腕关节的治疗方法不同。对于手术适应证,目前尚无明确共识。舟骨切除和四角融合锁定板固定是治疗这些病变的首选方法之一。本研究的目的是评估锁定板治疗 SNAC 和 SLAC 腕关节的临床和影像学结果,平均随访 5 年后,并将这些结果与文献报道的结果进行比较。在两家医院进行了一项回顾性研究,共纳入 40 例 2006 年 1 月至 2016 年 9 月期间接受舟骨切除和四角融合锁定板固定的患者。所有患者均进行门诊复查,包括临床和影像学测量。末次随访时,视觉模拟评分(VAS)的平均疼痛水平为 2.5/10 [0-7](标准差:1.7)。患者的平均屈曲度为 46%,平均伸展度为 46%,与对侧相比。握力增加了 18%。术后 QuickDASH 评分的平均得分为 30 [0-57](标准差:15.3)。70%的患者对手术满意。55%的患者达到完全(所有四个关节面)关节间隙融合。只有 1 例(2.5%)患者未发生关节融合。38 例(95%)患者的舟月关节融合,9 例患者发生并发症,其中 8 例(20%)需要手术翻修。四角融合锁定板固定是治疗 SLAC 和 SNAC 腕关节的一种有价值的手术技术,因为它保留了令人满意的活动度和握力(与未手术侧相比为 64%),维持了腕骨的高度,防止了桡腕关节炎的早期出现,只要掌握了该手术的技术挑战。