• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际皮肤病学疗效评估指标(IDEOM)小组2016年纽约会议:会议总结及银屑病工作组数据

International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) Group 2016 New York Meeting: Meeting Summary and Data from the Psoriasis Working Group.

作者信息

Perez-Chada Lourdes M, Singh Sanminder, Callis-Duffin Kristina, Garg Amit, Gottlieb Alice B, Latella John, Armstrong April W, Merola Joseph F

出版信息

J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Aug 1;16(8):770-777.

PMID:28809992
Abstract

The International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) Group was established to develop validated and standardized patient-centered outcome measures in dermatology that meet the needs of stakeholders and can be used in clinical practice as well as clinical research. At this meeting, we aimed to define the final core domain set to be assessed in psoriasis clinical research and to identify which of the current psoriasis assessment instruments appropriately address those domains. Specifically, we sought to ascertain stakeholder input on domain match and feasibility of multiple psoriasis instruments. We presented 19 physician-reported and 23 patient-reported outcome measures at the meeting. Stakeholders anonymously voted on the validity and feasibility of each instrument. Validity was rated as: green (good), amber (fair), red (poor), and white (not enough information). Feasibility was rated as: green (feasible), amber (concerns about some aspects of feasibility), red (not feasible), and white (not enough information). Eighteen physician-reported and 20 patient-reported instruments received a favorable green or amber rating for validity from the majority of voters. Seventeen physician-reported and 19 patient-reported instruments received a green or amber rating for feasibility from the majority of voters. A significant proportion of the psoriasis instruments received a good or fair vote for measuring their intended psoriasis domains in a feasible manner. We will continue to refine our voting methodology and incorporate patient input into our process of defining psoriasis domains and developing validated instruments.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(8):770-777.

.
摘要

国际皮肤病学疗效指标(IDEOM)小组的成立旨在开发经过验证且标准化的、以患者为中心的皮肤病学疗效指标,以满足利益相关者的需求,并可用于临床实践和临床研究。在本次会议上,我们旨在确定银屑病临床研究中最终要评估的核心领域集,并确定当前哪些银屑病评估工具能够恰当地涵盖这些领域。具体而言,我们试图确定利益相关者对多个银屑病工具在领域匹配度和可行性方面的意见。我们在会议上展示了19项医生报告的和23项患者报告的疗效指标。利益相关者对每项工具的有效性和可行性进行了匿名投票。有效性的评级为:绿色(良好)、琥珀色(尚可)、红色(较差)和白色(信息不足)。可行性的评级为:绿色(可行)、琥珀色(对某些可行性方面存在担忧)、红色(不可行)和白色(信息不足)。18项医生报告的和20项患者报告的工具在有效性方面获得了大多数投票者的绿色或琥珀色好评。17项医生报告的和19项患者报告的工具在可行性方面获得了大多数投票者的绿色或琥珀色评级。相当一部分银屑病工具在以可行的方式测量其预期的银屑病领域方面获得了良好或尚可的投票结果。我们将继续完善我们的投票方法,并将患者的意见纳入我们定义银屑病领域和开发经过验证的工具的过程中。

《皮肤药物学杂志》。2017年;16(8):770 - 777。

相似文献

1
International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) Group 2016 New York Meeting: Meeting Summary and Data from the Psoriasis Working Group.国际皮肤病学疗效评估指标(IDEOM)小组2016年纽约会议:会议总结及银屑病工作组数据
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Aug 1;16(8):770-777.
2
Defining Outcome Measures for Psoriasis: The IDEOM Report from the GRAPPA 2016 Annual Meeting.定义银屑病的疗效评估指标:GRAPPA 2016年会的IDEOM报告。
J Rheumatol. 2017 May;44(5):701-702. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170151.
3
The International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) Initiative: A Review and Update.国际皮肤病学疗效评估指标(IDEOM)计划:综述与更新
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Feb 1;16(2):119-124.
4
Achieving international consensus on the assessment of psoriatic arthritis in psoriasis clinical trials: an International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) initiative.实现银屑病临床试验中对银屑病关节炎评估的国际共识:国际皮肤病学结局测量(IDEOM)倡议。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2018 Nov;310(9):701-710. doi: 10.1007/s00403-018-1855-3. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
5
Investigator and Patient Global Assessment Measures for Psoriasis Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review on Measurement Properties from the International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) Initiative.银屑病临床试验的研究者和患者整体评估测量指标:来自国际皮肤病学结局测量(IDEOM)倡议的测量特性的系统评价。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020 Jun;21(3):323-338. doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00496-w.
6
Examination of Treatment Satisfaction Instruments in Psoriasis: 2017 Results from the Psoriasis Working Group of the International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM).银屑病治疗满意度测评工具研究:国际皮肤病学成果测量指标(IDEOM)银屑病工作组 2017 年研究结果。
Dermatology. 2021;237(2):151-157. doi: 10.1159/000501582. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
7
International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM): Report from the 2021 Annual Meeting.国际皮肤病学结局测量(IDEOM):2021 年年会报告。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2022 Aug 1;21(8):867-874. doi: 10.36849/JDD.6974.
8
Report of the Skin Research Workgroups from the GRAPPA 2018 Annual Meeting.GRAPPA 2018年会皮肤研究工作组报告。
J Rheumatol Suppl. 2019 Jun;95:28-32. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.190124.
9
International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM): Report from the 2020 Annual Meeting.国际皮肤病学结局测量指标(IDEOM):2020 年年会报告。
Dermatology. 2022;238(3):430-437. doi: 10.1159/000518966. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
10
International Dermatology Outcome Measures Initiative as Applied to Psoriatic Disease Outcomes: An Update.应用于银屑病疾病结局的国际皮肤病学结局测量倡议:最新进展。
J Rheumatol. 2016 May;43(5):959-60. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160114.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of DermSat-7 for Assessing Treatment Satisfaction in Patients With Psoriasis.用于评估银屑病患者治疗满意度的DermSat-7验证
JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Feb 26;161(4):416-20. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.6567.
2
Psoriasis Severity Assessment Combining Physician and Patient Reported Outcomes: The Optimal Psoriasis Assessment Tool.结合医生和患者报告结果的银屑病严重程度评估:最佳银屑病评估工具。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Aug;11(4):1249-1263. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00544-6. Epub 2021 May 28.
3
Clinical Goals and Barriers to Effective Psoriasis Care.
银屑病有效护理的临床目标与障碍
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2019 Mar;9(1):5-18. doi: 10.1007/s13555-018-0279-5. Epub 2018 Dec 21.