a Department of Psychology , Royal Holloway, University of London , Egham , UK.
b Department of Psychology and Center for Brain Sciences , Harvard University , Cambridge , MA , USA.
Cogn Emot. 2018 Jun;32(4):812-826. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1358698. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
Adopting a temporally distant perspective on stressors reduces distress in adults. Here we investigate whether the extent to which individuals project themselves into the future influences distancing efficacy. We also examined modulating effects of age across adolescence and reactive aggression: factors associated with reduced future-thinking and poor emotion regulation. Participants (N = 83, aged 12-22) read scenarios and rated negative affect when adopting a distant-future perspective, near-future perspective, or when reacting naturally. Self-report data revealed significant downregulation of negative affect during the distant-future condition, with a similar though non-significant skin conductance pattern. Importantly, participants who projected further ahead showed the greatest distress reductions. While temporal distancing efficacy did not vary with age, participants reporting greater reactive aggression showed reduced distancing efficacy, and projected themselves less far into the future. Findings demonstrate the importance of temporal extent in effective temporal distancing; shedding light on a potential mechanism for poor emotional control associated with reactive aggression.
从时间上看长远的角度看待压力源可以减轻成年人的痛苦。在这里,我们研究个体对未来的投射程度是否会影响距离的有效性。我们还研究了年龄在青少年和反应性攻击中的调节作用:这些因素与减少未来思维和情绪调节不良有关。参与者(N=83,年龄 12-22 岁)阅读情景并在采用遥远的未来视角、近期视角或自然反应时对负面情绪进行评分。自我报告的数据显示,在遥远的未来条件下,负面情绪有明显的下调,皮肤电导率的模式也相似但不显著。重要的是,那些能更长远地展望未来的参与者表现出最大的痛苦减轻。虽然时间距离的有效性不因年龄而异,但报告有更多反应性攻击的参与者的距离有效性降低,对未来的展望也更少。研究结果表明,在有效的时间距离中,时间范围很重要;这为与反应性攻击相关的情绪控制不良提供了一个潜在的机制。