Suppr超能文献

在一项双盲、固定剂量的延长期研究中探索阿立哌唑对成人精神分裂症患者的长期安全性。

Exploring the long-term safety of asenapine in adults with schizophrenia in a double-blind, fixed-dose, extension study.

作者信息

Durgam Suresh, Landbloom Ronald P, Mackle Mary, Wu Xiao, Mathews Maju, Nasrallah Henry A

机构信息

Allergan Inc, Jersey City.

Merck, Whitehouse Station.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Jul 31;13:2021-2035. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S130211. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study was to assess long-term safety with sublingual asenapine 2.5 or 5 mg twice daily (BID) in patients with schizophrenia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Actively treated patients on asenapine 2.5 mg BID, asenapine 5 mg BID, or olanzapine 15 mg once daily (QD) who completed a 6-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and olanzapine-controlled study continued lead-in treatment in this 26-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, olanzapine-controlled Phase IIIB extension study; placebo patients were assigned to asenapine 2.5 mg BID treatment. Safety analyses were based on the all treated set (patients who received one or more doses of extension trial medication); change from baseline analyses used the acute study baseline. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and changes in laboratory parameters were monitored; weight change for asenapine versus olanzapine was the key secondary objective. Descriptive statistics were used; weight change was analyzed using a mixed-model repeated-measure approach.

RESULTS

Of the 120 patients in the all-treated set, 60% completed treatment (asenapine 2.5 mg BID 66.1% overall, asenapine 5 mg BID 52.4%, olanzapine 15 mg QD 56.3%). The incidence of TEAEs was higher for placebo patients from the lead-in study who switched to asenapine 2.5 mg BID for extension treatment (71.0%) versus patients continuing asenapine 2.5 mg BID (38.7%), asenapine 5 mg BID (38.1%), or olanzapine 15 mg QD (25.0%). The most common TEAE (≥5% in every group) was worsening of schizophrenia. Least squares mean change in body weight from the acute study baseline to week 26 was +0.6 kg for overall asenapine 2.5 mg BID, +0.8 kg for asenapine 5 mg BID, and +1.2 kg for olanzapine 15 mg QD. There were no clinically relevant changes in metabolic parameters; values were generally similar across treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Asenapine 2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID were generally well tolerated in long-term treatment. Weight gain was less for overall asenapine 2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID than for olanzapine 15 mg QD.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是评估每日两次(BID)舌下含服阿立哌唑2.5毫克或5毫克对精神分裂症患者的长期安全性。

患者与方法

在一项为期6周的随机、双盲、安慰剂和奥氮平对照研究中,接受阿立哌唑2.5毫克BID、阿立哌唑5毫克BID或奥氮平15毫克每日一次(QD)积极治疗并完成研究的患者,继续参与这项为期26周、多中心、双盲、双模拟、奥氮平对照的IIIB期扩展研究;安慰剂组患者被分配接受阿立哌唑2.5毫克BID治疗。安全性分析基于所有接受治疗的患者(接受过一剂或多剂扩展试验药物的患者);从基线变化分析使用急性研究的基线数据。监测治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)和实验室参数变化;阿立哌唑与奥氮平的体重变化是关键次要目标。采用描述性统计;体重变化采用混合模型重复测量方法进行分析。

结果

在所有接受治疗的120例患者中,60%完成了治疗(阿立哌唑2.5毫克BID总体完成率为66.1%,阿立哌唑5毫克BID为52.4%,奥氮平15毫克QD为56.3%)。导入期研究中改用阿立哌唑2.5毫克BID进行扩展治疗的安慰剂组患者的TEAE发生率(71.0%)高于继续接受阿立哌唑2.5毫克BID(38.7%)、阿立哌唑5毫克BID(38.1%)或奥氮平15毫克QD(25.0%)治疗的患者。最常见的TEAE(每组≥5%)是精神分裂症病情恶化。从急性研究基线到第26周,阿立哌唑2.5毫克BID总体体重的最小二乘均值变化为+0.6千克,阿立哌唑5毫克BID为+0.8千克,奥氮平15毫克QD为+1.2千克。代谢参数无临床相关变化;各治疗组数值总体相似。

结论

阿立哌唑2.5毫克BID和5毫克BID在长期治疗中总体耐受性良好。阿立哌唑2.5毫克BID和5毫克BID总体的体重增加少于奥氮平15毫克QD。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/166a/5546824/7ae51736e35e/ndt-13-2021Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验